Tag Archives: Connecticut Department of Transportation

The Merritt Parkway: Cutting, Planting, Crashing

In the aftermath of the recent Paul Bunyan activity near the Merritt, a group of interested Westporters, Norwalkers and Fairfielders — not all of whom live near the parkway — have done some letter-writing.

They wanted to know whether new trees — less prone to fall over and kill people — would be planted once the dangerous ones were removed.

The Merritt Parkway before...

The Merritt Parkway before…

They contacted state representatives and the Department of Transportation.

The answer was “yes.”

There will be short trees and shrubs that “give” easily.

The new, improved vegetation is not only to prevent deaths by landing on cars, but also to prevent deaths when cars run off the road and smash into them. That happens a lot more than trees toppling in high winds and hurricanes.

The stumps that line the roadside now will be removed “soon.”

Homeowners hope the planting takes place “soon,” as well. They (and the new Y) are pretty exposed, following the recent cutting.

The DOT is working with the Merritt Parkway Conservancy on this project.

At the same time, DOT plans to replace all rusted metal guard rails with reinforced wood ones.

Hopefully they too will “give” when drivers plow into them.

Westport Selected For Innovative Traffic Light Removal Project

Traffic lights — the bane of Westport drivers — may all but disappear from Westport roads soon.

Governor Dannel Malloy will announce later today that Westport is one of 3 Connecticut towns chosen for a pilot project that — counter-intuitively, but logically — will remove traffic lights in an attempt to improve traffic flow and ease accidents.

This may soon be obsolete in Westport.

This may soon be obsolete in Westport.

Studies show that dangerous intersections without lights — such as Westport’s complex Easton Road/Weston Road intersection near Merritt Parkway Exit 42 — have far fewer accidents than less complex intersections with lights. The reason is that drivers proceed more cautiously through tough, light-less intersections.

The plan — developed by the Connecticut Department of Transportation — involves the removal of 80 percent of traffic lights in 3 towns (Westport, Guilford and West Hartford).

“Rather than attempting to ‘beat lights,’ we expect drivers will come to full stops at all intersections without lights,” a DOT report said. “They will proceed with caution, alternating through previously lighted intersections much as drivers do now at 4-way stops controlled by stop signs.”

The pilot program will run from early August through the end of the year.

It is projected to cost $2.8 million. Funding — which includes removal of red lights, installation of stop signs (and warning signs), and a contingency legal fund in case of lawsuits — comes from the DOT and Eno Center for Transportation.

Coincidentally, William Phelps Eno — who developed many modern traffic techniques, including red lights — lived for many years in Westport.

DOT is requesting input from Westporters as to which lights should be included in the 80% that will be removed, and which should remain. Click here to suggest lights for removal or retention, or click here to offer feedback on the plan.

A typical scene: Two drivers -- from opposite directions -- head through clear red lights. This scene is at the Post Road,Roseville and Hillspoint intersection.

A typical scene: Two drivers — from opposite directions — head through clear red lights. This scene is at the Post Road,Roseville and Hillspoint intersection.

Red & Whites: Busted!

Occasionally in the past, Red & White — the tux-and-long-dress, girl-ask-boy dance for Westport, Weston, Wilton and Fairfield seniors — has made headlines for less than chivalrous reasons. There’s been drinking, fights — the usual formal dance stuff.

The County Assembly board — sponsors of the charity ball — cracked down. Everyone is now breathalyzed both arriving and departing. All outerwear is coat-checked — purses too.

Well, last night there was another major problem.

But this one did not involve high school students. This time, it was bus and limo companies’ turn to behave badly.

stretch limo

According to an email from the County Assembly board, sent this morning to all parents of attendees, the state Department of Transportation was “anonymously notified about our event.” They arrived at the Stamford Marriott with Stamford police, and began checking buses and limos.

A number were out-of-state vehicles, without a license to operate in Connecticut. They were allowed to drop dance-goers off, but that was it. The drivers were “detained,” and their buses and limos towed.

Talk about a buzzkill!

Each company was supposed to provide alternate (and legal) transportation home for the riders, but that wasn’t happening.

CT dept trans“In order to provide safety for your children we attempted to keep them all in the same area as many of their buses were not here,” the County Assembly board wrote.

The board “encourages” parents to demand refunds of the miscreant bus and limo companies.

“They should never have accepted this job and left many of your children stranded and upset,” the email continued.

A number of parents jumped into cars to pick up their teenagers. I am sure that is the last thing they — parents and kids — wanted. I am also sure it is the first thing this year’s Red and White-goers will remember — years from now — about last night.

Tonight is the County Assembly — a similar dance, at the same hotel, for junior girls and their dates.

Added to the checklist — tux? dress? boutonniere? corsage? after-party? — is this one:

Legal driver?

A Little Relief For Rail Commuters

Metro-North trains whiz past Westport with alarming frequency.

But there’s a bit of light at the end of the (train station) tunnel.

CT Rides — a service of the Connecticut Department of Transportation — now offers “guaranteed rides” to monthly Uniticket shuttle bus riders.

Ticket-holders needing a ride to or from the Saugatuck or Green’s Farms station because of an emergency — like illness, family crisis or working late unexpectedly — can call 1-877-CTRIDES. A taxi will provide station drop-off or pick-up — free.

Eligible commuters can use up to 4 rides a year. They’re available whenever New Haven Line trains are running, and the Westport shuttles are not (mid-day or evening).

No word yet on whether the service is available to commuters screwed over when Metro-North misses its Westport stop.

Westport’s Greatest Mansion

Government is sometimes the problem.

Sometimes, it’s the solution.

Yesterday, I posted a short piece on the unkempt condition of the strip between Bridge Street and Mansion Clam House.

Early this morning, Mansion owner Soozi Folsom commented:

Mansion maintained the property from 2007-2010 when we were sent a cease and desist letter. Apparently the state was worried we would claim adverse possession.

Last year the state mowed every week. This year I had to beg the bridge workers to cut it. I call State DOT maintenance every week and beg for it to be maintained. I have had no luck.

Westporters resigned themselves to months more of mess.

But wait!

Soozi just posted this addendum:

After posting I again called the State DOT and asked for the supervisor. We spoke at length, and he could think of 2 reasons for a cease and desist.

1) There was bridge work and they didn’t want the liability

2) I quote: “Someone had an irritating hair up their ass.” He verbally revoked any order, and we came to an agreement. His crew and their big ass mowers will take care of the parcel later this week to get it manageable.

We (Mansion) will then commit to maintaining weekly. Onward and upward!

Yay, smart supervisor at DOT!

Double-yay, for Soozi and the Mansion Clam House!!

One more reason to love Westport — and to celebrate with a beer at the Mansion bar.

Westport’s latest heroes.

5 MPH On the Merritt

Beyond killer trees and killer deer, the land abutting the Merritt Parkway is largely unused.

You can’t park there, picnic there, and you really shouldn’t pee there.

Soon — well, “soon” in government terms — that might change.

Some trees on the south side of the Merritt Parkway would have to be cleared for a biking and jogging path.

The state Department of Transportation is soliciting input on a bike and jogging path. Stretching 37 miles — from Greenwich to Stratford — it could even accommodate horses.

The trail — south of the parkway — would utilize the woods in between the road and adjacent properties.

The idea is still in the planning stages. (Nor is it new. Regional planners have envisioned something like it for years.)

But it has, um, merit. With the construction of the new Y at Mahackeno, a “greenway” could be a substantial add-on (and traffic reliever) to that project.

It could tie that part of town in with areas east and west in ways we can’t even envision, because when we’re in our cars we don’t see where the land can lead. There would be many access points between Exits 41 and 42 — and in each direction beyond.

And while a few trees would have to be sacrificed, that’s a few less trees to fall on unsuspecting motorists.

It’s a bit early to wiggle into your spandex. Public meetings must be held. Then come engineering studies, designs, funding requests, a lawsuit or 5…

So don’t expect to amble alongside the parkway this summer. Or next. Maybe in your grandchild’s lifetime.

But a journey (or jog) of a thousand miles begins with a single step. If you’re interested in that journey, check out these workshops:

  • Wednesday, March 22 (Stamford Government Center, 5:30 p.m.)
  • Monday, March 26 (Greenwich Town Hall, 6 p.m.)
  • Tuesday, April 3 (New Canaan Outback Teen Center, 6 p.m.)
  • Tuesday, April 10 (Fairfield Osborn Hill School, 6 p.m.).

This is what a jogging and biking path might look like, according to the website ConstructionEquipmentGuide.com.

Deadly Roads, Part II

This morning’s Post Road post propelled an “06880” reader to pass along a personal perspective.

Earlier this winter, the reader contacted an RTM member regarding a school bus stop sign that seemed useless.  The RTM rep contacted police chief Al Fiore, who sent an officer to investigate.  The conclusion was that the sign ensured safety.

A picture is worth a thousand accidents.

Because the police department seemed interested, the reader followed up with several other safety concerns about the Post Road.  The cops referred the reader to the Connecticut Department of Transportation, which oversees US 1.  It took a while to find the right bureaucrats.

Once discovered — they’re Joseph P. Ouellette, transportation supervising engineer, Bureau of Engineering and Construction, and Ernest Lajoga (a transportation engineer) — the reader wrote with these concerns:

Motorists turn left onto the Post Road from both Route 136 (Compo Road) approaches despite red lights.  Is there enough green time to “move the queue”?

There is not enough time for pedestrians to cross the Post Road between Compo Shopping Center (CVS) and Compo Acres (Trader Joe’s).  Could there be an exclusive “walk” time when lights on all 4 sides are red?

Ditto the crosswalks at Taylor Place (Tiffany) and Parker Harding Plaza (Starbucks).  Could those have exclusive “walk” phases too?

DOT officials contacted Westport officials:  “First Selectman, Public Works, Police Department” in January.  Ouellette emailed the “06880” reader this response:  “The Town was not in favor of revising the pedestrian treatment at the shopping center signal at this time.  Also, the Police Department did not feel that there is a problem with left-turns from Rte 136 onto Rte 1.”

Ouellette continued:  “The Department relies on input from town officials because they have more local knowledge of traffic concerns that (sic) we do.  I realize that the issues you describe are important to you.  I suggest that you contact Public Safety Officer John Parisi (203-341-6000) at the Westport Police Department if you want to pursue further.  If the town agrees with your concerns, we will investigate.”

“06880” will keep you “posted.”

And The Signs Say…

The Connecticut Department of Transportation has authorized the Town of Westport to remove illegal signage from state roads here, WestportNow.com reports.

Over a year ago, P&Z director Larry Bradley said his department had received many complaints about “excessive and/or illegal commercial signage.”  Today’s decision is a direct result of that problem.

In related news, WestportNow says, the P&Z will continue to suspend enforcement of free-standing portable signs displayed in front of Westport businesses until January 31.  That action addresses merchants’ needs in a down economy.

“06880” has no comment on these 2 news items.

Legal? Illegal? Or both?

News Flash: Traffic On I-95

(Photo courtesy of joe-ks.com)

(Photo courtesy of joe-ks.com)

The Department of Transportation warns that nighttime milling and resurfacing will cause delays on I-95 in Westport and Fairfield.

Work is being performed both northbound (exits 17 to 19) and southbound (exits 24 to 17).  The work schedule is 10 p.m. to 5:30 a.m. Sunday evenings, and 8 p.m. to 5:30 a.m. Monday through Thursday evenings. The project runs through Sept. 23.

The DOT wants drivers to prepare for delays.  As opposed to the rest of the year, when you cruise along with not a care in the world.