Tag Archives: Dogport

[OPINION] Keep Open Space At Winslow

Posted on September 9, 2026 | 22 comments

Laurie Gilman, a retired editorial and research director, has lived in Westport for 15 years. An avid reader, she recently helped establish the Winslow Book Club. 

She has a significant other of 40 years, many beloved nieces and nephews, and an 8-year-old pug named Charley who was taken in when he was a year old.  Charley walks her around Winslow Park nearly every day. Laurie writes:

We are less than a week away from a vote by the Planning & Zoning Commission on Text Amendment #874. It would alter the zoning laws at Winslow Park in order to build a “dogport” — a fenced area for dogs.

A survey, petition and letters show this is unpopular among dog owners and citizens who want to preserve open space in Westport.

Winslow Park (Photo/Ron Henkin)

The only convincing argument for this project is for dog safety. Gaps remain in the park’s perimeter, where dogs can reach busy roads. Very well thought out, detailed plans have been submitted to the P&Z website that would remove those gaps, and cost Westport less in terms of money and open space.

In addition to ignoring the good ideas to fence the park, a dogport has its own problems with dog safety — for example, dogs being more aggressive in an enclosed area. So we’re pretty sure this isn’t about the issue of dog safety. Far from it.

The amendments explicitly states, “By concentrating off-leash activities into a designated area the proposal helps reduce conflicts between park users, improves predictability for families and walkers, and promotes responsible pet ownership through rules, regulations, and accountability.”

How is it possible to “concentrate” all unleashed dog activity into a dogport when the majority of dog owners at Winslow want to walk with their dogs?  Only if rules are changed that force dog owners into the dog port.

Dogs, on and off leash.

A rule requiring dogs to be leashed throughout the park could happen. But that won’t go far enough, because dog owners will still want to walk their dogs on leash. What is more likely is taking the extraordinary step of denying dog owners access to the rest of the park.

“The proposal helps reduce conflicts between park users.” We think the dog owners at Winslow have a very good relationship with all the other users of the park: kids riding bikes or scooters or sleighing during the winter; parents walking their children who stop to pet our dogs, and people of all ages out getting their walk in.

We have never witnessed a conflict between park users without dogs and those with dogs.  We have seen conflicts between dog owners.  If you were to go to the park today you might find posters of a woman whose dog attacked another dog, and did not take responsibility for the aggressive behavior from her dog.

We are all aware of this incident, and are on the lookout for the owner and her dog if they return. We are a community that acts to keep the park peaceful and protect all its users.

Winslow Park community. (Photo/Cat Malkin)

Finally, a dog port “promotes responsible pet ownership through rules, regulations, and accountability.”  There are already rules and regulations posted at Winslow, and the vast majority of owners follow them. Keeping dog owners accountable seems to imply bad behavior of dogs. That can happen in or outside of a dog port.

We all value the beautiful open space and trails at Winslow. By passing this amendment and “concentrating off-leash activity,” dog owners are rightfully concerned that their access to the rest of the park will end.

It’s not a stretch to imagine other uses of the park will replace us. What those may be should concern all of Westport residents who want to protect the unique and cherished open area that is Winslow.

Laurie Gilman
On behalf of the Friends of Winslow Park

(“06880” Opinion pages are open to all readers. Email submissions to 06880blog@gmail.com. To help support this hyper-local blog, please click here.)

22 Comments

Posted in Environment, Local politics

Tagged , ,

Roundup: Lights, Dogs, Shellfishing …

Posted on September 9, 2026 | 3 comments

From athletes and environmentalists to dog lovers, deli patrons and anyone interested in Saugatuck, Monday’s Planning & Zoning Commission meeting has something for everyone.

The September 14 (6 p.m.; Zoom) agenda includes:

  • Pre-application for a subdivision on Dogwood Lnae
  • Lights on Wakeman and PJ Romano Fields
  • Text amendment to permit fenced recreational dog play
  • Text amendment regarding outdoor eating and the sale of alcohol in a new Food and Beverage Planned Development District
  • Map amendment to rezone 11 properties from General Business District/ Saugatuck Marina to a proposed General Business District/Saugatuck.

Click here for the full agenda. Click here, then scroll down for background information on each item. 

The P&Z will again discuss lights on the turf Wakeman Field.

==================================================

“06880” readers are not shy about telling us when someone is up to no good.

Illegal tree cutting, inconsiderate e-bike riders, ill-mannered dogs in supermarkets — we hear it all.

But somehow we missed what seems to be the biggest story of the summer.

At least, according to the Connecticut Centinal.

The oddly spelled site — which Media Bias/Fact Check calls “an extreme right-biased imposter website (rated) Questionable based on the promotion of propaganda, conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, poor sourcing, and false claims” — recently published a “BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Illegals Raping Natural Resources In Westport, Cops Don’t Care, Town Doesn’t Care, State Doesn’t Care.”

The story (by “Staff Writer”) says, “There are a lot of people in Westport, CT who profess to care for the environment, or is that just a control mechanism to gain political power?

“Because, no one cares in Westport when their environment is being destroyed as long as its [sic] being done by illegal aliens. By the hundreds. Every Night. Till there is nothing left.”

After noting state and town shellfishing regulations — including permits, size and sunrise to sunset limits — the site claims: “illegal night harvesting is happening at a massive scale in Westport, and across the state.

“‘Unbelievable, isn’t it? Take a ride by old Mill and look at the Spanish guys with Minor’s [sic] hats on, responded one resident we asked who lives in the Compo Beach area when asked if what was going on nightly is legal.

“There’s no blue crabs left. No steamers. No Clams. No mussels.

“Another resident of Old Mill told us, ‘There’s nothing left, they stripped the place clean.'”

The story concludes, “It would be nice if all those environmentalists in Westport actually cared. Mother nature is screaming for help.”

Click here for the full story.

This photo was captioned “Illegals night harvesting at Old Mill Beach, Westport, CT.” (Photo courtesy of CT Centinal)

==================================================

The Connecticut League of Conservation Voters — founded by Westporters Julie Belaga and Russ Brenneman 26 years ago — has chosen another local for a Lifetime Achievement Award.

Jonathan Steinberg, Westport’s outgoing state representative — will be honored October 9 (6 p.m., Elm City Club, New Haven).

CTLCV calls him “a leading voice in the Connecticut General Assembly on clean energy, environmental protection, and public health for more than 15 years. He has played a key role in major environmental efforts, including the plastic bag ban, fracking waste moratorium, GMO labeling, and microplastics legislation, while consistently advancing renewable energy, solar power, and utility accountability.

“As House chair of both the Public Health Committee and the Energy & Technology Committee, Jonathan helped shape modern energy policy and led the charge on the State Water Plan to ensure Connecticut’s waters remain protected.”

He is one of 4 awardees. The other are State Senator Tony Hwang, State Representative Mary Mushinsky and New Haven Mayor Justin Elicker.

CTLCV board member Pippa Bell Ader, and former members Eileen Lavigne and Ken Bernhard — all of Westport — invite residents to click here for more information on the dinner.

State Representative Jonathan Steinberg

=================================================

The latest reports from Lyman, Ukraine are somewhat encouraging.

Russian forces have not succeeded in capturing Westport’s sister city. In fact, Ukrainian troops have pushed Russians back in some areas north of Lyman.

But Russian forces continue offensive operations. Fighting could intensify this fall. (Hat tip: Robert Gerrity)

Recent damage in Lyman. (Photo/Tyler Hicks for New York Times)

==================================================

Jerry Garcia can’t be at VFW Post 399 this Saturday, September 12. (He died in 1995.)

But the next best thing — The Mystery Train Band — will pay tribute to the Grateful Dead icon. They also play Bob Dylan, The Band, The Beatles, Van Morrison and other classic artists.

Doors open at 6:30 p.m.; the music starts at 7:30. Tickets are $10, at the door or online. Pizza, hot dogs and drink specials are available too.

=================================================

Kawa Ni’s very popular “Paint + Sip” events continue this month.

Artists — of any and all levels — are invited to the restaurant’s rooftop garden. There, Lauren Smith leads them in a special event, overlooking the Saugatuck River.

For $56 you get painting supplies, an 8″x10″ canvas, and Kawa Ni fare. Wine, sake and cocktails are available for purchase.

The next 2 events are September 16 and 30. Click here to register. 

=================================================

The Service League of Boys (SLOBs) is Staples High School’s largest club.

As the school year begins, they’re looking for new members. Students and parents are welcome.

The organization promotes leadership through community service. You’ve probably seen them helping out at many events, all over town.

Students and parents are invited to a meeting next Tuesday (September 15, 7:30 p.m., Staples cafeteria). For more information, click here, follow them on Instagram @shsslobs, or email president@shsslobs.com.

==================================================

Jazz at the Post kicks off its fall season tomorrow (Thursday, VFW Post 399; dinner service from 6:45 p.m.; shows at 7:30 and 8:45).

Pianist Janice Friedman presents a new program, including creative touches on music by Paul Simon, Billie Eilish and Amy Winehouse, as well as her own originals.

Friedman has played with saxophonist Greg “The Jazz Rabbi” Wall since the late 1980s. They’ll be joined by bassist Dave Kingsnorth and drummer Mike Campenni. Click here for tickets, and more information.

==================================================

Whether Westport is figuratively for the birds is up for debate.

But for literal proof, look no further than today’s “Westport … Naturally” featured photo, from Compo’s South Beach:

(Photo/Ken Schwarz)

=======================================================

And finally … in honor of Jerry Garcia’s (tribute) appearance at the VFW (item above):

(It’s no mystery: “06880” relies on support from readers like you. If you appreciate these daily Roundups — or anything else on our hyper-local blog — please click here to donate. Thank you all!)

3 Comments

Posted in Entertainment, Environment, Local politics, Politics, Staples HS

Tagged , , , , , , , ,

[OPINION] Fenced Dog Area: “A Solution Looking For A Problem”

Posted on August 17, 2026 | 36 comments

Ken Bernhard is a longtime Westporter. He spent 8 years representing our town in Connecticut’s General Assembly, rising to assistant minority leader. He was 3rd selectman from 1987 to ’89, then served on the Zoning Board of Appeals.

Ken Bernhard

Bernhard has been a board member of the Westport Library, Visiting Nurse & Hospice of Fairfield County, Westport Weston Chamber of Commerce, Norwalk Human Services Council, Earthplace, Westport Historical Society, Levitt Pavilion, Aspetuck Land Trust, Fidelco Guide Dog Foundation, and Connecticut League of Conservation Voters. He has also worked with Syrian refugees.

In advance of tonight’s Planning & Zoning Commission meeting (6 p.m., Zoom), which includes discussion of a text amendment that would permit a fenced dog area to be located within a park, Bernhard wrote to commissioners:

I am writing to respectfully oppose Text Amendment #874, which would modify §40, Dedicated Open Space and Recreation District #1 to permit 2 fenced recreational dog play areas at Winslow Park.

In my view, this amendment is a solution looking for a problem that does not exist. The existing arrangement at Winslow Park has worked successfully for more than 20 years. One area allows dogs to exercise and play off leash, while another requires dogs to remain leashed.

This arrangement provides a sensible balance and allows different park users to enjoy Winslow Park according to their preferences. Before fundamentally changing a system that has worked for decades, the Commission should identify the specific problem this amendment is intended to address and determine whether that problem exists.

If the concern is that dogs might run into the street, there are far simpler, less expensive, and less intrusive solutions than constructing enclosed dog facilities. A modest fence, wall, or other barrier along the roadway could address that specific safety concern without converting a portion of the park into a confined dog enclosure.

The existing off-leash area of Winslow Park should instead be recognized for what it really is: a people park as much as it is a dog park.

Its value is not simply that dogs are permitted to run free. The existing arrangement allows owners to walk, exercise, socialize, and enjoy the natural surroundings while spending time with their pets. People get exercise alongside their dogs, and the dogs get exercise, socialization, and the opportunity to explore. That combination of human recreation, outdoor exercise, nature, and responsible pet ownership is precisely what makes the existing area so valuable.

Winslow Park is for people too.

This is particularly important as Westport experiences growth in the number of apartment residences. Many new residents, as well as existing residents who live in apartments or other housing without large yards, need accessible places where they can walk and exercise their dogs. Winslow Park serves that need exceptionally well because it allows both people and dogs to get meaningful exercise and socialize together.

A fenced dog run does not provide the same benefit. Once a dog and owner enter a relatively small enclosure, the opportunity for a long walk through the park is eliminated. The owner loses the exercise and enjoyment of walking in the park, while the dog loses the opportunity to explore a larger natural environment.

A fenced dog area would therefore reduce, rather than expand, the recreational value of Winslow Park for many dog owners. The goal should be to encourage people to walk and exercise with their dogs—not simply to provide a place where dogs can be contained.

The proposal is particularly questionable because it calls for 2 separate enclosed areas—one for large dogs and one for small dogs. This distinction makes little sense as a means of promoting safety. Aggressiveness and temperament are matters of individual personality and training, not characteristics that correspond reliably to the size of a dog. Separating dogs simply by size does not address the underlying issue of temperament. And what, exactly, is the plan for medium-sized dogs? Creating arbitrary categories raises more questions than it answers.

Winslow Park (Photo/Ron Henkin)

The proposed location raises additional practical concerns. It does not have convenient parking or a readily available water supply. That makes the location particularly inconvenient for dog owners who want to come to the park to walk and exercise with their dogs. The very feature that makes Winslow Park successful — the opportunity for people and dogs to move through and enjoy a larger natural setting — would be diminished by directing users into a fenced enclosure.

Enclosed dog areas can also become soiled quickly, creating sanitation and maintenance concerns. Concentrating numerous unfamiliar dogs in a confined space can produce tension and conflicts that are less likely to occur when dogs have room to move and interact naturally. These are unnecessary issues to introduce into a park system that currently provides a spacious and natural alternative.

I was a Westport resident when the park was acquired decades ago. A similar proposal was considered around that time by the Parks & Recreation Commission and was rejected. This commission should be cautious about revisiting a proposal that was previously determined to be unnecessary, particularly when the existing system continues to function effectively.

The Winslow Park dog community.

Furthermore, approximately half of Winslow Park remains an area where dogs are required to be leashed. This provides substantial space for residents and visitors who prefer not to encounter unleashed dogs.

Finally, I would strongly oppose any effort to commercialize the proposed fenced area or restrict its use to Westport residents. Such a policy would be discriminatory and unnecessarily unfriendly to people from neighboring communities. Visitors who come to Westport with their dogs are not simply users of our parks; they are also customers of our restaurants, retail stores, and other local businesses. Westport benefits from being a welcoming community, and we should not adopt policies that unnecessarily exclude or stigmatize people who live outside our borders.

Additionally, the enforcement mechanism being proposed by the proponents introduces a new regulatory framework that imposes a cost and logistical burden on residents and non-residents alike.

The commission should preserve what already works well, rather than create an expensive, restrictive facility to address a problem that has not been identified. Winslow Park currently offers something difficult to replicate: a place where people can walk, exercise, enjoy nature, socialize and spend quality time with their dogs, while still providing ample space for those who prefer leashed dogs. It is one of Westport’s assets that helps to make our community both unique and a special place to live.

For these reasons, I respectfully urge the Commission to reject Text Amendment #874, and preserve the existing, successful arrangement at Winslow Park.

(“06880” Opinion pages are open to all. Email submissions to 06880blog@gmail.com. To support “06880” with a tax-deductible contribution, please click here.)

36 Comments

Posted in Environment, Local politics

Tagged , , ,

Dogport Organizer: The Back Story, Where It Stands Now, What’s Ahead

Posted on August 17, 2026 | 12 comments

Tonight’s Planning & Zoning Commission meeting (6 p.m., Zoom) includes discussion of a text amendment that would permit a fenced dog area to be located within a park,

Emme Dorfman — a rising senior at Staples High School — helped devise the plan. Today, she shares background on how the idea began, and where it stands now. She hopes too to clear up some misconceptions. She writes:

I first came up with the idea for a fenced-in dog area at Winslow Park last year, as a junior. For my Rhetoric & Persuasion class, I wrote a speech about why I thought Westport could benefit from having a secure area where dogs could run off leash.

I have 2 dogs. When we take them to Winslow, we are always a little nervous that one could get away.

After the class ended, I decided I wanted to pursue the idea. I connected with Representative Town Meeting (RTM) member Andrew Colabella, who had also been working to bring a fenced-in dog area to Westport.

Winslow Park. Compo Road North is at the bottom. The Park extends further to the south (left), toward the Post Road.

I was probably a little naive at first, maybe because of my age and lack of experience with town government. I thought the idea was pretty simple: Winslow is a large park, so why not fence in a portion of it, giving residents and non-residents the option of using a secure off-leash area if that works better for them and their dogs?

We initially proposed an area at the south end of Winslow. After presenting the idea at a Parks & Recreation Commission meeting, it became clear that many regular Winslow users really value that particular meadow. and that some neighbors across Compo Road also had concerns. While we know there will probably never be a location that everyone agrees on, we heard those concerns and began looking at alternatives.

I also want to clarify that the original south end location was the basis for the survey Mark Mathias conducted and has been shared with so many people.

Since then the proposal has changed, which we will share at the next Parks & Recreation meeting. A few weeks ago, Andrew and I met with David Floyd (Parks & Rec chair).

We discussed a possible location on the opposite end of the park, closer to the Compo parking lot and by Post Road. We think this could address many of the concerns we heard. because it would not interfere with the meadow or the way most people currently use Winslow. It would simply be an additional option for dog owners who want or need a secure place for their dogs to exercise. Nothing is official; we are just exploring other options.

One possible location for the fenced-in area: a section near Compo Road North and the Post Road (behind trees in the photo above). It is currently little used by dogs and walkers.

Because of this, I think it is important to recognize that some of the people currently speaking out based on the survey may be responding to information about a proposal that is no longer being considered.

This project is about giving people options. People who love using Winslow exactly as they do today should continue to do that. No one would be required to use the fenced area or change the way they enjoy the rest of the park.

For residents and non-residents who want or need a secure off-leash option, we think there should be one available. We also believe convenience and accessibility for the people and dogs who would use the area are important considerations, alongside aesthetics.

My grandfather is 80 and can’t easily walk around Winslow, but he would love to be able to get out of his car, bring his dog into a secure area, and let him run and get the exercise he needs. My sister recently hurt her knee playing soccer, but she can still enjoy being there with them if they have a secure place to play.

I also understand that some people have raised the point that Winslow is officially considered a park, rather than a “dog park.” But dogs are already clearly part of how Winslow is used. At the entrance there are dog waste bags, a dog water fountain, and signage specifically addressing dogs and their use of the park. Regardless of the official terminology, Winslow already accommodates people using the park with their dogs. We are simply proposing an additional option within that existing use.

We have also adjusted other parts of our original proposal based on feedback. For example, we initially discussed a key-fob access system. We heard concerns about that, so we are no longer proposing it. Instead, the idea would be for dog owners to have the appropriate vaccination and rabies documentation through the town registration process.

Enforcement has also been raised as a concern. That is something we would continue discussing with the dog warden, who we have spoken with, and the town. The fenced area would have clearly posted rules, and users would be expected to behave responsibly, clean up after their dogs, respect other users and follow those rules, just as people are expected to do throughout Winslow today.

I also wanted to clear up one misconception. My mom was at Winslow today and spoke with people who were circulating a petition. She was told that some people are concerned that the entire park could eventually be fenced in. That has never been part of our proposal. We are proposing one designated fenced-in area within Winslow. As information gets passed from person to person, details can understandably get confused, which is one reason I wanted to send this update.

Additionally, no changes would be made to the on-leash versus off-leash areas. Those rules would remain the same.

(Photo/Mark Mathias)

We haven’t been providing many updates this summer because when we spoke with Parks & Recreation, we were told that things tend to be quieter during the summer and would pick back up in September. Nothing has been decided behind the scenes.

Our next step is tonight’s Planning & Zoning meeting, where we hope to have a text amendment approved. It would simply allow us to move forward with the process; it does not approve a location or a final dog park plan.

If the text amendment passes, the next step would be to develop and present a specific proposal, including the potential new location, and continue gathering input from everyone — residents and non-residents, people who currently use Winslow, neighbors, and people who may not use Winslow today because they don’t feel comfortable having their dogs off leash.

We would really like to work together as we move forward, so that any future survey reflects the most current proposal, and accurately explains what is and isn’t being considered. We don’t want anyone to feel that their concerns haven’t been heard. Many of the changes we are considering are a direct result of listening to those concerns.

What we’ve learned is that people in opposition may speak up more loudly than the people in support. We understand how important it is to listen, adjust, and try to find a solution that works for as many people as possible.

(“06880” reports regularly on town affairs — political, environmental, human, canine and more. If you appreciate our 24/7/365 work, please click here to support us. Thank you!)

12 Comments

Posted in Environment, Local politics, Staples HS

Tagged , , , ,

Roundup: Dogs, Sports, Taylor Swift …

Posted on August 7, 2026 | 11 comments

It’s the dog days of August.

With many Westporters out of town in the final days before school resumes, most boards have canceled meetings.

Not the Planning & Zoning Commission.

And their August 17 meeting (6 p.m., Zoom) is nothing to sniff at.

They’ll consider a text amendment submitted by Representative Town Meeting member Andrew Colabella. He explains, “The text amendment would allow a form of recreation to be conducted on designated open space where active leisurely use already occurs, providing the option for a fenced dog area to be located within a park.

“It is important to understand that this is not an approval of a specific dog park or a final site plan. Rather, it is a change to the zoning regulations that would permit the use to be considered. Any specific proposal would still be subject to additional public review and approvals.

“The P&Z is not being asked to decide whether Winslow Park should have a dog run. It is being asked whether the zoning regulations should allow a fenced dog area as a permitted recreational use on designated open space where active recreational uses are already appropriate. The merits and details of any specific location remain separate questions.”

Colabella and student Emme Dorfman have designed a concept, and been given an OK for their pre-app.

“The concept will either be supported or rejected by the Parks & Recreation Commission, and is within respect to outside expert analysis by the Parks Master Plan to be located at Winslow, after carefully reviewing all viable parks and town properties throughout Westport,” Colabella adds.

Click here for background information. Click here (and then scroll down to Text Amendment #874) for additional materials. 

Westport resident Mark Mathias says that, according to Planning & Zoning director Michelle Perillie, the P&Z can either keep the matter open or close it.

If they vote to approve — either that night or at a later meeting — the petitioners must submit an 8-24 Municipal Improvement Request, and Special Permit Site Plan, to the P&Z. The Parks & Recreation Department would also be involved.

Details including exact location, funding, design, and management of the space would still need to be proposed and approved.

Rendering of a possible “Dogport” at Winslow Park.

==================================================

The 64th annual Westport PAL Chief Samuel Luciano Golf Tournament tees off August 31, at Longshore.

A major fundraiser, proceeds fund the organization’s scholarship program. To register, or join as a sponsor, click here.

================================================

Speaking of the police and scholarships: Classic cars, custom vehicles, local vendors and community members come together this Sunday (August 9, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m.) — all in support of a great cause.

The 8th annual Charity Car show (148 East Avenue, Norwalk) benefits the Vincent Penna Scholarship Program for high school students. It honors the memory of the late deputy chief of the Westport Police Department.

Sunday’s event — hosted by the Italian American Police Society — includes a raffle with over $35,000 in prizes, donated by more than 100 sponsors. They include automotive parts and accessories, tools, gift certificates and specialty items.

Vincent Penna Jr.

=================================================

Speaking (still) of sports: TOPSoccer — the program for youngsters with physical or learning differences — returns for another season.

Blake Serotta — a rising sophomore player at Staples — leads the program, in conjunction with the Weston Soccer Club and Westport Soccer Association.

TOPSoccer is open to boys and girls in grades K-8. It runs Saturdays, 11;30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., from September 12  through November 7 at Morehouse Farm Park in Weston.

The program includes fun games, drills, and small-sided games. Each child is paired with a buddy, who stays with them on the field. High schoolers are welcome as volunteers and buddies.

To learn more, and sign up as a player or buddy, click here. Questions? Email blake.serotta@gmail.com

==================================================

Speaking yet again of sports: Congratulations to Northeast Elite Water Polo Club.

The Westport-based youth program won the 14U Boys Gold Division championship at the USA Water Polo Junior Olympics, the nation’s largest youth water polo tournament, in Dallas.

It was not easy. The team lost their first 3 tourney games, before rallying to win 5 straight. They finished with 74 goals in 8 matches, over 5 days.

Northeast Elite was founded in 2024 by Staples High School coach Danilo Sierra-Giraldo, and Kade Ramirez-Zimmerman. Winning players include Julian Urist, Alexander Vandenberg, Sagan Feder, Sascha Bowtell, Oliver Melnichok, Yash Mani Lorenzato, Calvin Jahansouz, Santos Infantino, Ben Scanlon, Cullen Shope, Aaron Bhuyan and Joshua Smith.

Northeast Elite water polo champs.

==================================================

The Unitarian Universalist Congregation in Westport is hosting another humongous tag sale.

And everyone is invited.

The event is Saturday, August 15 (8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.; early birds 8 a.m., $20).

They missed last year, due to building renovations. So now there are 2 years’ worth of all kinds of stuff to check out.

And buy.

A small part of the big crowd at the Unitarian Universalist tag sale.

==================================================

The curtain has fallen on the last show of the Westport Country Playhouse’s 2025-26 season.

But the stage is set for more entertainment.

“Cruel Summer” — a live band playing the music of Ariana Grande, Olivia Dean, Taylor Swift, Sabrina Carpenter and more — rocks the theater on Friday, August 28 (7 p.m.).

Click here for tickets, and more information.

Taylor Swift will not be at the Westport Country Playhouse this month. But her music will be.

Westporter Peter Van Heerden took the helm of Pequot Library a little over 4 months ago.

But he’s already infused new energy into the 132-year-old institution, and forged community partnerships and collaborations.

One example: On September 10 (7 p.m.), Broadway legend and area resident James Naughton joins Mia Dillon, Jill Eikenberry and Michael Tucker for a reading of historic documents tied to the Declaration of Independence. A Q-and-A follows. Click here for details. and to register.

The program is part of the Pequot’s summer Special Collections exhibition, Unfinished Revolution: 250 Years of Marking American Independence.

On September 25 (7 p.m.), Naughton and friends return for a Closing Exhibition Celebration featuring another reading, Q-and-A, and a live band performance. Tickets ($50 per person) support exhibition programming. Click here for details.

And on September 19, the Pequot’s benefit features the famed Paul Taylor Dance Company. Limited to 300 attendees, the event launches the library’s new Summer Stage plan to bring top-tier talent to the region. Tickets start at $100, and sponsorships are available. Click here for details.

James Naughton

==================================================

Of all the plants we’ve plastered in this “Westport … Naturally” series, none may be better named than “elephant ears.”

Richard Fogel spotted these guys near Webb Road:

(Photo/Richard Fogel)

==================================================

And finally … in honor of Taylor Swift’s (non)-appearance at the Westport Country Playhouse (item above):

(Okay, so Taylor Swift won’t be on the Playhouse stage. But Westport still has “06880.” Please help keep us here, by making a tax-deductible contribution here. Thank you!)

11 Comments

Posted in Arts, Environment, Local politics, Police, Sports, Westport Country Playhouse

Tagged , , , , , , ,

Dogport: The Survey Says …

Posted on July 22, 2026 | 5 comments

A fenced-in dog run at Winslow Park is not on tonight’s Parks & Recreation Commission agenda (Wednesday, 8 p.m.; Zoom).

But the topic may be raised in the “Public Comment” part of the meeting.

Commissioners generally do not respond publicly, and a vote is a long way off. But if a “Dogport” is brought up, it might include data from a second survey of Winslow Park users.

The survey — which is still online — received 338 responses, as of yesterday afternoon. 85.5% of the respondents live in Westport.

The majority (60.7%) oppose creation of a separate, fenced area. 22% are in favor, while 17.3% are undecided.

The main concerns include the disruption of natural beauty and open space. Fencing is viewed as unnecessary, an eyesore, and potentially disruptive. Many believe current open, leash-free areas work well and should remain unchanged.

Survey QR code at Winslow Park.

Some users oppose the Dogport altogether; others prefer a different location. Some support a fenced area if it does not detract from Winslow’s open space, with emphasis on proper planning and minimal disruption.

While a majority of respondents believe fencing reduces the risk of dogs running into traffic and enhances owner supervision, others say that fenced areas can increase aggression, territorial behavior, and fights between dogs.

Owner responsibility was a major issue. Respondents stressed the importance of training and supervision, over fencing.

Suggested improvements for Winslow Park include better fencing along existing boundaries, and enforcing leash rules.

If a Dogpark is approved (the preferred size is 1/2 acre), the proposed site along Compo Road North garnered approval from just 18.5%. That location was not favored by 41.5%, while 40% were undecided.

Rendering of the proposed site, along Compo Road North.

Alternative locations suggested included Longshore, Compo Beach, Riverside Park and Baron’s South. One respondent offered “the back yard of the student who suggested it and the town rep who supports it.” Another said, “nowhere. People have back yards. Let dogs run there.”

If a Dogport is implemented, 45% favored town funding. 39.2% say funds should come from people who use it, while 15.8% are undecided.

And if a Dogport is built, 56.8% believe it should be open to non-residents. 21.8% would ban out-of-towners; 21.5% are undecided

For the full survey, with results, click here.

5 Comments

Posted in Categories

Tagged , ,

Winslow Dogport: Where Off-Leash Run Now Stands

Posted on July 20, 2026 | 21 comments

Has activity around a fenced, off-leash area for canines in Winslow Park been “pawsed” since our most recent report, last month?

No! Mark Mathias sent this email last week, to residents who are interested in the project:

First, our survey now has 333 respondents.  I’m very impressed with this outcome. In addition, 103 people who filled out the survey gave us their email asking to be kept informed.

Second, we are primarily waiting for the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting to put on the agenda the request for a text amendment that would allow a dog run (aka “Dogport”) to be built in Winslow Park.

Should the text amendment be granted, that doesn’t mean construction will start. As I read the documents they simply allow it, but don’t state what or where it will look like, who will pay for it, who will maintain it, and more.

Those are separate questions that will have to be addressed if the P&Z approves the application for the text amendment.

One proposal for a fenced-in off-leash area at Winslow Park.

Third, on Monday morning this week, I met at Winslow Park with Emme Dorfman (one of the applicants), Ali Dorfman (Emme’s mother), and Jon Polayes (invited by the Dorfmans) in order to see what options might be available.

Discussions included having only a small dog area, moving the fenced area to the southeast corner of Winslow Park where Compo Road and the Post Road meet, and more.

Fourth, many people have expressed health concerns about Dogport. I reached out to respected local veterinarian Dr. Irwin Lebish, and asked his thoughts on the initiative. He said:

I don’t have any specific objections to a fenced-in dog run area in Winslow Park. My main concern would be the transmission of intestinal parasites through contamination of the surface. Ordinary grass would be a problem because if stools are not picked up, and even if they are, parasite eggs and larvae could leach into the surface and be transmitted.

The best surface in terms of cleanliness and maintenance would be pet grade artificial turf. However, to cover an area you describe would be very expensive.

The next best surface would be decomposed granite/washed stone. How much more aggressive behavior would occur in a fenced-in area is difficult to determine. A lot depends on the density of the dog population inside the area.

Fifth, we discussed the issues of how to pay for the creation of the fenced-in area, maintenance and upkeep, as well as other logistical matters that would require various town agencies (mainly the Parks & Recreation Department) involvement, and funding, not only initially but on an annual basis.

Winslow Park (Photo/Mark Mathias)

One question that I am frequently asked is whether a fenced-in off-leash area would ultimately lead to having the rest of Winslow Park be made on-leash.  People have told me stories of towns around Westport where they have seen this occur, but I have no firsthand knowledge of this. If anyone receiving this has reliable information about this, please send it to me (winslowdogport@gmail.com).

In summary, I continue having enjoyable and informative conversations with people in Winslow Park as I walk Loki there daily. Please feel free to say hello, and give your perspectives on this matter.

I will continue to work with Emme and her supporters to help craft a plan that will have a positive impact on Westport.

I am also monitoring the agendas for both Parks & Recreation and Planning & Zoning to see what agenda items appear on their agendas so that anyone who is interested in conveying their opinions to the relevant officials can do so at the appropriate time, whether in advance of their meetings or by joining their meetings (many of which are held over Zoom).

I welcome conversations and insights from you and hope you will help inform me of your suggestions and opinions: winslowdogport@gmail.com.

(“06880” reports regularly on Westport’s residents — and dogs. If you enjoy coverage like this, please click here to support our work. Thank you!)

21 Comments

Posted in Environment, Local politics

Tagged , ,

Winslow Park Dogport: 2nd Survey Seeks Input

Posted on June 9, 2026 | 4 comments

As the proposal to create a fenced area in Winslow Park for off-leash dogs moves forward, some residents say proponents are barking up the wrong tree.

This month, Representative Town Meeting member Andrew Colabella filed a request with the Planning & Zoning Department for a text amendment change to the Dedicated Open Space and Recreation District Zone.

It would “provide a safe, controlled area for off-leash recreation, while preserving the park’s overall open space character and public accessibility.” The area would “enhance (Winslow Park) through responsible management, improved safety, and additional recreational opportunities for residents.”

Proposed location of the Winslow Park “Dogport.”

Mark Mathias — who lives near Winslow Park, and uses it frequently with his dog — tells “06880” that the proposed “Dogport” has elicited plenty of discussion at the 29-acre town-owned property.

He said a recent Zoom call with the Parks & Recreation Commission did not result in a recommendation. The conversation ended, Mathias says, with commissioner recommending that alternate locations — other than the proposed site along Compo Road North — be explored.

Proponents were urged to put a flyer at Winslow Park, with a link to their survey. A few days later, the flyer — with a QR code — was placed at the water fountain, and other spots (photo below). Click here for a link to that survey.

However, Mathias says, some Winslow Park regulars felt the survey did not address “fundamental issues,” or “adequately reflect the views of people who use Winslow Park.”

They created their own longer survey, and posted 3 signs in the park with links to it (photo below). Click here for a link to that survey.

(Photos/Mark Mathias)

Mathias urges residents to fill out either or both surveys — and/or contact the Planning & Zoning Commission directly. NOTE: The text amendment proposal has not yet been added as an agenda item.

(“06880” never dogs it. We work 24/7/365, to bring you news, features, photos and more, about every area of local life. We rely on reader support. Please click here to support our work. Thanks!)

4 Comments

Posted in Environment, Local politics

Tagged , , , , ,