Larry Weisman and his family moved to Westport in 1966. He brought his law practice here in 1979.

Larry Weisman
Concentrating on zoning law, he has represented the Gorham Island developer, the Gault Saugatuck project, the Westport Library, Aspetuck Town Trust, Compo Beach playground effort, the Westport Weston Family YMCA and many other significant projects.
He has watched the battle over the Hamlet at Saugatuck project with interest. He writes:
What if ROAN Ventures — the developers of the Hamlet — were to withdraw its application, with the understanding that it can be refiled at any time?
And what if the town of Westport — not the Planning & Zoning Commission — were to appoint a committee of knowledgeable and experienced real estate developers to discuss with ROAN a public/private partnership to develop Saugatuck?
And what if the town made a substantial contribution to the project — not necessarily in dollars only, but also by contributing in-kind services, and perhaps expansion of the project into adjacent town-owned sites? And what if that included redesigning the sea of asphalt which is now the railroad parking lot, to address parking concerns?

Part of Saugatuck today that ROAN Ventures hopes to develop. It would be part of a public/private partnership that Larry Weisman proposes.
I think the result of such an effort could produce a substantial amount of 8-30g residential units. They would be not in 8-story buildings, but perhaps in 3- or 4- story buildings around a central court, with the remainder of the property devoted to a judicious mix of commercial and office uses, with appropriate amenities on the river.
Traffic patterns and parking options could be explored more thoroughly with the participation of the town. Ancillary uses, such as a theater and hotel, could be better evaluated in terms of community need if public opinion were taken into account.
Uses designed to serve an expanded residential neighborhood, such as a pharmacy, hardware store and grocery, could be included in the mix to promote a sense of community.

In 2018, a Transit Oriented District plan envisioned redevelopment of Saugatuck.
A secondary effect would be a reduction in traffic.
Architectural style could be addressed more effectively. An eye toward creating a more community-friendly design and walkable streetscape would add to a sense of community.
It’s my guess that such a scheme has the potential to produce a win-win result. The developer and its investors would turn a reasonable profit, and the town and its citizens would have their say.
I think the end result is likely to be better and more acceptable to the citizenry for having participated than anything we’re likely to get from the P&Z through the prescribed process.
This is a bold proposal, to be sure. I recognize that there will be those who say that it would set a dangerous precedent for negotiated zoning, which would threaten the prerogatives and run counter to the statutory responsibilities of the P&Z and the conventional system of land use regulation, which contemplates measuring development proposals against a predetermined set of regulations.
But I think the redevelopment of Saugatuck is an issue of such magnitude and consequence to the community as a whole that it can be seen as a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity which is worth the risk.
All that’s lacking is leadership.
(“06880’s” Opinion pages are open to all. Please email submissions to 06880blog@gmail.com)





















