Category Archives: Local politics

Roundup: Candidate Forums, Candidate Signs, AI & Us …

Early voting starts a week from tomorrow (Monday, October 20).

Unsure who to vote for? Clueless about the candidates?

Two events this week can help.

On Tuesday (October 14, 7 p.m., Toquet Hall) the 3 candidates for 1st selectman will answer questions (from moderators and the audience) on stage. The League of Women Voters Westport and Westport Youth Commission are sponsors. This is a special event for students, but adults are invited.

On Wednesday (October 15, 2 p.m., Senior Center) the LWV sponsors “A Conversation with Board of Finance Candidates.”

This Thursday (October 16, 6:30 p.m., Greens Farms Academy), Westport Journal is sponsoring a 1st Selectman candidates debate. Registration is required; click here

Coming soon:

  • Select Board Candidates Debate: October 21, 12 p.m., Westport Library. Sponsored by Westport Weston Chamber of Commerce.
  • A Seat at the Selectman’s Table: October 21, 6 p.m., Westport Library. Sponsored by Westport Library Common Ground Initiative. Registration required; click here
  • A Conversation with Board of Education Candidates: October 22, 7 p.m., Toquet Hall. Co-sponsored by League of Women Voters Westport and “06880.”
  • A Conversation with Planning & Zoning Commission Candidates: October 23; 7 p.m. Senior Center. Co-sponsored by League of Women Voters Westport and “06880.”
  • Candidates Debates: Board of Education, Zoning Board of Appeals, Board of Assessment Appeals, Board of Finance: October 27, 6:30 p.m., Westport Library. Sponsored by the League of Women Voters Westport.
  • Candidates Debate: 1st Selectman and Planning & Zoning Commission: October 28, 6:30 p.m., Westport Library. Sponsored by the League of Women Voters Westport. 

==================================================

Speaking of voting, Lynn Flint writes:

“Someone banged on my door around midday today, a man I did not recognize. I ignored the pounding. He left after a while, but he left a brochure. I’m guessing it was for a campaign.

“I can’t reach it to read it, because I can’t find my grabber. Maybe tomorrow morning I’ll figure out what it’s about.

“This is a very bad time to go around pounding on people’s doors. We’re all a little nervous about strangers. If he is running for an office, he doesn’t understand the right way to do it.

“I had another candidate stick signs on my property, without permission.

“I also think this barrage of signs is distracting to drivers. Should we vote for the first person in the line of signs, the last person or somebody in the middle? Do they really want to look like lawn maintenance or a tag sale?

“The blight committee is so fastidious about the image of Westport. How can they stomach these hideous signs everywhere on our roadsides?

“If people want to know how to vote, it’s much more informative to consider the statements of the individuals and the information put out by the League of Women Voters, don’t you think?”

(NOTE: Campaign signs are free speech, and permitted on town property. However, they cannot be put on private property without the owner’s permission.)

================================================

Hundreds of human beings gathered yesterday at the Westport Library, to discuss their future — at least, as it relates to artificial intelligence.

The in-depth exploration of AI — and its implications across law, business, healthcare, education and technology — was sponsored by Verso University, the Library’s lifelong learning and education initiative.

It spanned 3 sessions. Yale Law School professor Scott Shapiro led off with a discussion of AI’s role in legal reasoning, government ethics, and cybersecurity, alongside Kevin Nguyen, features editor at The Verge.

The second session examined the ways in which AI is shaping Connecticut’s innovation landscape, higher education, healthcare, workforce and legislation.

The final session concluded with reflections from Kate Crawford, one of AI’s leading scholars of artificial intelligence and its material impacts. (Hat tip: Les Dinkin)

Kevin Nguyen and Kate Crawford. (Photo/Dinkin ESH Fotografix)

=================================================

Westporters will participate in Saturday’s “No Kings Day” national event.

The October 18 protest against President Trump begins at 11 a.m., at Jesup Green. Participants will march to Veterans Green, for speakers and music. The route follows one taken by Westport’s suffragists, in 1913.

One of the organizers, Darcy Hicks, says: “In Westport, No Kings Day is an opportunity to signal to our local leaders who we are and what we hold dear.

Most of us spend much of our time caring for family, whether that is our children, spouses, or parents. This is about them.

“We are marching for the preservation of the water and air they breathe, for truth in their classrooms, for their healthcare, and for their social security. Most of all, we are marching for the rehabilitation of love, and the right for all of our neighbors, regardless of their faith, gender identity, race, or economic standing, to live with dignity.”

A “No Kings” sign, from Westport’s June protest. (Photo/Pippa Bell Ader)

=================================================

I’m not sure what “Fish on the Pumpkin” is.

But it’s one of the seasonal specials you’ll find at Basso’s Halloween party.

It’s October 31. Music starts at 7:30 p.m. Manny Montañez and his orchestra will play — with Chef Renato joining in on percussion. Dancing is encourage.

So are costumes are encouraged (but not required). Click here for reservations.

==================================================

TAP Strength is all about helping people feel more confident and capable in their bodies. A new program supports an important group: neurodivergent teens and young adults.

The next event in their “Effortless Effort” speaker series is this Tuesday (October 14, 6 to 7 p.m., 180 Post Road East). at its Post Road East studio. It’s a conversation between TAP founder Dr. EJ Zebro and Chelsea Elkind and Lauren Rosenblum, founders of Westport-based NeuroMind. They’ve helped TAP design a program that is inclusive, supportive, and grounded in real-world needs.

To RSVP or for more information, email info@tapstrength.com.

==================================================

Walk ALS comes to Sherwood Island State Park this Saturday (October 18). Registration begins at 10 a.m. The walk kicks off at 11.

Click here for details, and more information.

==================================================

Renaissance and Baroque dances, folk songs and vocal masterworks from England, France and Italy fill Christ & Holy Trinity Church’s Branson Hall this Saturday (October 18, 5 p.m.

Soprano Sherezade Panthaki joins Parthenia Viol Consort (praised by The New Yorker as “one of the brightest lights in New York’s early-music scene”).

A reception follows the concert. Click here for tickets, and more information.

This was not taken at Christ & Holy Trinity Church’s Branson Hall. But that’s where Saturday’s concert will be.

=================================================

Duke University’s women’s crew team had a successful High Point Autumn Rowing Festival — thanks in large part to Mia Khamish of Westport.

Competing against international competition from Edinburgh and Oxford in North Carolina, the Blue Devils snagged 2 first-place finishes.

In the afternoon 8 race, the senior coxswain’s decision-making at a crucial moment made a key difference.

Coach Adrian Spracklen called it “very mature, very smart … a tremendous call that you expect from a senior — someone that’s done it before.” To see the race, click here.

The Staples High graduate rowed for the Connecticut Boat Club.

Mia Khamish

===============================================

Yeah, yeah, we’ve posted a couple of close-up “Westport … Naturally” photos recently of bees doing their thing with flowers.

In this one, the flowers are the focus.

Literally.

(Photo/Juliana Rosenoer)

==================================================

And finally … today is the birthday of James “Sugar Boy” Crawford.

The New Orleans R&B musician wrote “Jock-a-Mo” in 1954.

A Mardi Gras standard, it became a hit a decade later for the Dixie Cups, as “Iko Iko.” It was recorded by many other artists too, including Dr. John, Belle Stars, the Grateful Dead, Cyndi Lauper, and (as “Geto Boys”) by Glass Candy.

But Crawford’ s career ended in 1963. A severe beating at the hands of state troopers incapacitated him for 2 years. In 1969, he decided to sing only in churches. He died in 2012, at 77. He is now in the Louisiana Music Hall Of Fame.

(No matter who you vote for, there’s one decision we can all agree on: When you click here to support “06880,” everyone wins! No recount necessary … thank you!)

[OPINION] Needs Assessment Needed Before Parks Master Plan

Rick Jaffe was trained as a management consultant and a software engineer. After attending last week’s Parks Master Plan public workshop, he sent this letter to Westport Parks & Recreation Department director Erik Barbieri:

Last night’s Public Workshop showed me a critical flaw in our town’s Parks Master Plan process: We are trying to solve a problem without first having determined what that problem is.

We are building a 10-year Parks Master Plan for enhancing our town’s parks offerings without first having figured out what park-related resources we as a community need.

When I was a member of our town’s Representative Town Meeting, I tried to interest your predecessor to spearhead a ‘Needs Assessment’ to figure out what parks resources would best fit our community’s needs, and compare that to what our town currently offers.

Then we could build a long-term plan that would include evaluating our current parks resources, and identifying opportunities for change and improvement to come closer to the ideal of providing the best possible parks for our community.

When we put the cart before the horse as we are doing now, solving the Parks Master Plan process without first knowing what we want the Master Plan to lead to, we make mistakes in identifying what to do and what not to do, and with what priority.

The result will be a less-than-optimal plan and, eventually, less than optimal parks resources available to our community. Without the Needs study, we may miss important issues. A community suggestion coming from your Public Workshops can easily be overlooked, or recognized but prioritized too low, for want of support from actual data.

Here are two examples. An outdoor fitness center, or a network of outdoor fitness centers, is so valued by communities that recently AARP funded this one, and installed one in 53 US states and territories.

Outdoor fitness center. (Photo/Dan Foard, Videophotog Productions)

(FitLot’s inventor lives so close to us that they could be here to talk about it in minutes if we ask).

And what about a splash pad for kids? Other communities love them. From my personal observation (admittedly short on hard data), splash pads provide significant squeals of delight per square foot.

Splash pad.

There are communities out there that engage in the process of getting various user groups, like teenagers, to design their own parks, thereby maximizing the chance that those user groups will benefit.

Without a Needs Assessment the planning process is guided by feel, lucky guesses and experience.

Our town is unique and has unique needs, ones that require real community input to identify needs along with resources that are already in place that can be leveraged to better fit the lifestyles of our community members.

This is our chance to revamp the parks resources in Westport in a way that will not require a Master Plan re-do down the line because the actual needs and wants of the Westport community – as identified by the members themselves – were not addressed.

We can fix this, but we have to do it now, before the cart is cast in cement before the horse.

(“06880″‘s Opinion pages are open to all. Email submissions to 06880blog@gmail.com. To support this hyper-local blog with a tax-deductible contribution, please click here.)

Board Of Ed Race: Rift In Democratic Party

Three Democrats are running for the Board of Education.

In a normal year, party leaders would be delighted.

But this is not a normal year.

Because the Town Charter limits one political party to a bare majority — 4 seats — on the 7-member board, and because Democrats Lee Goldstein and Neil Phillips are in the middle of their 4-year terms, only 2 Democrats can be elected. Jill Dillon, who won a seat 2 years ago as an unaffiliated write-in candidate, is in the middle of her term too.

In March, the Democratic Town Committee interviewed several candidates for the Board of Ed. They chose incumbent Abby Tolan, and Representative Town Meeting deputy moderator Lauren Karpf.

Abby Tolan

Dissatisfied with those choices, Democrats Stephen Shackelford and Jodi Harris — an attorney and former Staples High School PTA president, respectively — opted to run as petitioning candidates.

They secured the signatures of over 400 registered Democrats, and will appear with Tolan on the party line this fall. (Shackelford had interviewed with the DTC for a Board of Ed endorsement in March, but was not selected.)

Karpf, meanwhile, bowed out of the race. She is running again for the RTM (in a new district, after moving).

The DTC opted not to replace Karpf. That leaves Tolan as the sole party- endorsed candidate.

Shackelford and Harris say that party officials are steering clear of their campaign. They tell “06880”:

“We’re proud to be running as Democrats for the Westport Board of Education this November. We are members of the Democratic Party, but we believe our campaign for common-sense solutions and results-driven oversight on the BOE transcends partisan lines.”

However, they note, “Our most significant hurdle is coming from within our own party.

“We secured our places on the Democratic ballot line not through appointment, but by gathering more than 400 signatures each from registered Westport Democrats. This feat represents a strong, grass-roots mandate for new voices on our BOE.”

Yet, they say, “despite this clear demonstration of support from the rank-and-file, the Westport Democratic Town Committee has taken a remarkable step: It has provided us with zero support — financial, logistical, or otherwise.”

Stephen Shackelford and Jodi Harris 

Even worse, Shackelford and Harris say, “the DTC appears to be actively campaigning for voters to ‘bullet vote’ only for (Tolan), despite the risk that doing so could result in Democrats winning only 1 of the 2 available spots.”

There are 4 seats up for contention, but the Democrats are limited to only 2 winning candidates. There are 5 Republicans running for 4 seats. Four were endorsed by the Republican Town Committee: incumbent Dorie Hordon, plus Andy Frankel, Michelle Hopson and Kaitlin Zucaro.

Incumbent Robert Harrington was not endorsed by the RTC. He is running as an independent write-in candidate. If the 4 Republicans win, they would take control of the BOE from the current 4 Democrats.

Shackelford and Harris say that the Democratic Town Committee is not the only political body to ignore their campaign.

“This campaign of exclusion extends to local party-affiliated groups.” the pair say.

“The Democratic Women of Westport, which we understand is meant to operate independently, has publicly promoted our opponent’s events to its members, but is refusing to include our upcoming events in its member communications.

“In short, the Democratic Party in Westport is telling its own registered voters that the grassroots effort from 2 newcomers doesn’t matter. They do not want you to hear from candidates who challenge their status quo.”

“06880” reached out to DTC chair Michelle Mechanic for comment.

She says: “The Westport Democratic Town Committee is committed to getting the most qualified Democratic candidates elected up and down the ballot, and maintaining the majority on our boards and commissions.

“With 2 spots available for Democrats on the Board of Education we urge you to vote for Abby Tolan, the vetted and endorsed candidate (whom the authors interestingly state is their opponent) and one other Democrat of your choosing.”

“06880” also asked the Democratic Women of Westport for comment. As of late last night, there was no response.

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Where We Stand”: Board Of Ed Candidates Address School Budget

An informed electorate is the greatest bulwark of democracy.

Westporters understand this is a very important election. “06880” is doing our part, to help Westporters understand candidates’ perspectives on a variety of issues.

Once a week, between now and Election Day, we’ll ask the men and women running for 3 important boards — Selectmen/women, Planning & Zoning, and Education — one specific question.

We’ll print their responses verbatim.

This week’s question for the Board of Education is:

Our schools are the reason many families move here. They are also the biggest part of the town budget, with salaries and benefits accounting for the lion’s share of educational expenses. What is the Board of Education’s role in balancing residents’ expectations for their schools, with economic realities?

===============================================

Robert Harrington (incumbent) was not endorsed for re-election by the Republican Town Committee. He is running as a write-in independent candidate. He says:

As Westport continues to invest in top-tier education, the Board of Education must ensure every dollar strengthens classrooms — not bureaucracy.

The Board of Education plays a vital role in balancing Westport’s high expectations for its schools with financial realities. While the Superintendent develops the budget based on his priorities and vision, the Board’s duty is to provide oversight — to ensure every dollar is spent wisely and directed toward student learning, classroom resources and program quality.

Robert Harrington

To frame the discussion, the Westport Public Schools operating budget for 2025–26 is approximately $150 million. Of that, certified staff salaries make up nearly $80 million (52.6%), and non-certified staff salaries another $19.5 million (13%). Combined, salaries represent more than 65% of the total budget.

Employee benefits — including medical and dental coverage, life insurance, Social Security/Medicare, etc. — add another $25.78 million (about 17%).

In plain English: nearly 83% of our entire operating budget goes toward the people who make our schools exceptional. That’s not a problem — it’s what drives excellence. Investing in teachers, administrators and staff allows Westport to maintain one of the top school districts in Connecticut, and the #1 high school in the state.

But because so much of the budget is tied to salaries and benefits, the board must ensure that new positions are added thoughtfully and that classroom priorities remain clear.

Over the past few years, we’ve seen above-inflation increases in our operating budget — driven by post-COVID adjustments and rising healthcare costs. Westport’s funding bodies have been generous and continue to support our schools, but with that support comes responsibility.

In August, the board voted to extend the superintendent’s contract early and grant a 4% raise. I voted against.

This was larger than what our nurses and custodians received. I believe that decision was poorly timed and poorly perceived. Some justified it as “a small amount of money,” but that misses the point. Leadership decisions send signals — and those signals matter.

The Board also has a duty to identify efficiencies and savings outside of the classroom — not at the expense of teaching, the arts, or athletics, but through smart management elsewhere.

I have been vocal about addressing transportation costs, which were approaching $8 million (excluding special education). Several years ago, there was little appetite to explore savings, and I was told my approach was “too chaotic.”

I persisted and pushed for a transportation study that had previously been voted down. For 2025–26, we are finally reducing two bus routes — saving over $300,000 — and exploring AI-assisted route planning to find further efficiencies.

I was also an early advocate for redistricting—not as a cost-saving measure, but to ensure that classroom space is used equitably across the district. It was difficult to justify spending on new portable classrooms when open classrooms already existed in other schools. My goal was simple: to prevent overcrowding in one school while underutilizing others. It wasn’t popular, but it was the right thing to do.

Our role, ultimately, is to safeguard both excellence and accountability — to make sure Westport continues to deliver an outstanding education while respecting the taxpayers who make it possible.

==================================================

Two Democrats will be on the ballot as petitioning candidates, having secured over 400 signatures. Jodi Harris and Stephen Shackelford say:

The district’s budget must respect separate but distinct stakeholders: residents whose children currently attend the public schools and deserve the very best service and programming, and those who have watched their children graduate or who have moved to Westport for everything but the schools, and need to protect their most valuable asset (their home) and pay reasonable taxes.

To be sure, the $150 million annual budget for schools seems generous. But more than 80 percent of that is contractual: salaries and benefits for our hardworking teachers and school staff.

What’s left can’t begin to cover building updates, curriculum and program enhancements, and the modernization demanded of a 21st-century school system. It just can’t.

Stephen Shackelford and Jodi Harris

So despite their best intentions, the district and BOE are left playing Whac-a-Mole, repairing things here, replacing things there, often only after a problem has gone from bad to worse, instead of tackling the district’s needs in a truly holistic, top-down, forward-thinking approach.

A few examples: The Staples auditorium hasn’t been touched in more than 30 years. Much of it is original and over 60 years old. The lighting mechanism got stuck on the stage last spring, rendering the auditorium inoperable for 6 weeks.

The Staples football field was built for a population of around 1,400, and now we’re at 1,700 and climbing. The stands are too small, bent and even wobbly in sections. The “away side” is cramped, dark, and surrounded by brush. The sound system is broken, there is no handicapped access or seating, and there are no bathrooms.

What’s more, Staples has no working girls’ locker room. Girls’ teams change in hallway bathrooms.

And we all know what happened after Coleytown Middle and Long Lots were neglected … and now Coleytown Elementary is reported to be close behind.

Kings Highway has a basement gymnasium and cafeteria that don’t meet ADA requirements. Concerns abound within the special-education system. Additionally, the district remains woefully short on substitutes and paraprofessionals.

A facilities committee meeting — the first since January — was quickly scheduled just recently, in response to many of these growing concerns. But wouldn’t everyone benefit from year-round follow-through — not just during campaign season?

So how do we address buildings and staffing while remaining fiscally responsible, forward-thinking and adaptable? First, we have to identify issues that haven’t made their way to the BOE yet, and then we have to do the hard work of creating real budgets for dealing with all of them, so we can make intelligent trade-offs, in both timing and funding, across our whole portfolio of problems.

Second, we have to find the money to tackle these projects. One solution we propose for consideration is a public-private partnership in which the district would accept outside donations.

This hinges on the district — in concert with the First Selectman’s office — approving the consideration of features like naming rights. Imagine a capital improvement campaign that allows our cherished alumni, current families and future graduates to make meaningful financial contributions in exchange for a named brick, plaque, or even an entire structure? How else does a public school district — even one the caliber of Westport — find the vast funds that are absolutely necessary to fix up its crown jewels?

Of course, nobody has a monopoly on knowing where the problems lie, or what the best solutions are. Our doors are open to all stakeholders who are ready to flag problems and propose solutions, and that’s exactly how we will operate if you elect us — people with new ideas, new experiences, new connections, and renewed passion for our kids and their education — to the BOE.

===============================================

Democratic Party-endorsed candidate Abby Tolan (incumbent) says:

Westport’s schools consistently receive top ratings, because we hire the best administrators and teachers. Keeping top quality employees in our schools is no different from any other industry. It requires competitive compensation and comprehensive healthcare benefits. 

Salaries and healthcare expenditures represent approximately 80% of the district’s operating budget. Staff salaries rise incrementally every year (usually between 3% and 4%). As for many families, it is the escalating cost of healthcare, both in premiums and claims, that exerts the greatest pressure and unpredictability on our budget.

Abby Tolan

For the 2025–2026 fiscal year, healthcare costs could have increased by as much as 40% with the private health insurance plan employees were on. However, by partnering with employees, the district was able to transition them to the State Partnership Plan, limiting our increase to 11%. 

While this is still a big increase, we could not have achieved these savings without the trust and willingness of the employees to move insurance plans. Our administration has this trust because we treat our employees fairly, and compensate them at rates that are competitive with other outstanding districts.

In the same vein, this administration has been transparent about our budgetary pressures, and responsive to other town governing bodies by not producing a padded budget. The Board of Education presented a responsible budget to the Board of Finance and the RTM for fiscal year 2025-2026, and they approved that budget unanimously.

Against this backdrop, we must still preserve essential programming and maintain robust staffing levels, additional qualities that make our schools so successful.

Doing so, however, requires making difficult budgetary choices, such as the decision not to reinstate a second full-time assistant principal in our elementary schools. While our principals presented thoughtful and compelling arguments in favor of reinstatement, it would have added approximately $400,000 to the budget.

I ultimately concluded that wasn’t the most prudent way to spend taxpayer dollars. Reinstating such positions would have necessitated cuts elsewhere in the budget. I didn’t want to sacrifice any of Westport’s schools’ exceptional academic programs, breadth of student opportunities, talented educators, or unwavering commitment to excellence in teaching and learning.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic and the proliferation of technology use, we have seen a marked increase in mental health concerns emerging even at the elementary level.

Nationwide, districts are witnessing an increase in students requiring special education services, often linked to mental health challenges that can result in costly outplacements to specialized schools.

Westport is not immune to this.  In response, the board has advanced initiatives such as “Effective School Solutions” (ESS), which enables the delivery of curriculum to students in the middle and high school rather than at an expensive outplacement. This program has been so successful that there are plans to expand ESS to the elementary level. 

Balancing fiscal responsibility with our enduring commitment to educational excellence is an inherently complex endeavor. We must continue to invest in programs and support systems that promote student success, foster emotional well-being, and ensure access to resources, all while exercising prudent stewardship of public funds. Through collaboration and thoughtful governance, we can sustain and strengthen the tradition of excellence that defines Westport’s schools for generations to come.

=================================================

Republican Party-endorsed candidates Dorie Hordon (incumbent), Michelle Hopson, Andy Frankel and Kaitlin Zucaro say: 

Our schools are often the main reason families choose Westport. They are a source of pride and the cornerstone of our community.

From a financial perspective, all taxpayers — even Westporters without children in our schools — have a direct economic interest in high quality schools. When a young family buys a house in Westport, they are not just buying a building and land. They’re also buying access to a top K-12 education. That access is reflected in the value of every home in town.

Of course, nothing in life is truly free — our schools are funded by property taxes. And the fact that our excellent schools underpin our property values does not mean we should spend recklessly on them.  To the contrary, we need to sustain funding for our great school system — but do it in the smartest way possible, spending wisely.

Michelle Hopson, Dorie Hordon, Kaitlin Zucaro, Andy Frankel.

Indeed, education accounts for more than 60% of the town budget. Salaries and benefits represent the vast majority of the school system operating budget. In fact, in fiscal year 2024-2025, salaries and benefits combined were $114 million — 80% of the total education budget.

This is why the incumbent Democrat majority’s decision to accept the recent above-inflation raises for the superintendent and other administrators was so irresponsible. Such decisions set unsustainable precedents, and put the town’s long-term financial health at risk.

Vice chair Dorie Hordon of our slate was the board member who was the most vocal opponent of these raises, and led opposition within the Board — but to no avail.

The motion passed 5-2. This illustrates why a change of leadership is needed at the board level, and why we urge you to vote for all 4, and elect our slate to bring accountability and fiscal responsibility back to our schools.

In addition, voters may not realize that board members are directly involved in negotiations with both unions and non-unionized employees within the district. Along with Dorie’s direct experience, our slate brings a high level of legal and financial expertise to these negotiation challenges and the budgeting process overall.

Our commitment to voters is to be laser-focused on making sound decisions about resource allocation. In terms of pay raises, we believe they should be reasonable and fair — but should not create precedents where the district is locked into unsustainably high pay increases year over year.

Professional development is another spending area that requires close scrutiny, as it also reduces instructional time. Spending on PD should support teachers and improve student outcomes, but it must be tied to clear educational priorities and deliver measurable results.

In addition to the operating budget, which covers personnel and the ongoing costs of maintaining our schools and programs, the other major financial responsibility of the Board of Education is long-term capital spending. The capital budget refers to long-term investments in facilities.

There are several major capital projects underway, including construction of the new Long Lots/Stepping Stones school, regular maintenance of all buildings, and the evaluation of next steps for Coleytown Elementary.

Key funding decisions will have to be made along the way, and the Board’s conclusions must be presented for approval by the Board of Finance. Our team brings the skills, experience and initiative required to work productively with the administration and deliver sensible outcomes that the town’s funding bodies can support.

Great schools benefit all Westport taxpayers. They strengthen our community and drive our property values. Our goal is to make sure we get the most out of that investment — a goal that takes the leadership, experience and expertise our team offers.

 

 

 

Long Lots Vegetation Clearing: Building Committee Responds

This morning, “06880” reported on the first day of construction for the new Long Lots Elementary School. Homeowners just south of the property reported that carefully drawn plans had been disregarded, resulting in clearance of an estimated 6,000 square feet of mature vegetation and growth beyond the construction road.

This afternoon, the Long Lots School Building Committee responded. They told “06880”:

This statement is intended to address the story regarding the over-clearing of vegetation on the Long Lots campus in close proximity to a resident’s home.  We would like to explain what happened, and what steps are being taken to address the situation.

Despite the extensive planning and multiple site visits conducted to review the area on the east side of the Long Lots campus which was designated for limited clearing, some additional vegetation beyond the intended scope was mistakenly removed by the contractor as the road for construction vehicles was installed.

It was a mistake and should not have happened. The issue has been reviewed extensively with all involved to ensure mistakes like this are not repeated.

Pre- and post-construction views.

To remedy the situation, a plan has been developed to plant a large evergreen buffer (in addition to similar plantings which will be planted on the site in the future) in the affected area within the next 1 to 2 weeks.

The homeowner who is most affected by this over-clearing will be involved in the placement of the trees in advance of the plantings. The Building Committee’s project manager has already been in contact with the homeowner.  A separate letter to Planning and Zoning which details this remediation is also in the process of being delivered.

While we sincerely regret this error at the start of the new school construction process, we also see the proposed remediation as an opportunity to improve the plans for the final result. Upon project completion, the landscape buffer between the school property and the residence closest to the east side of the campus will be enhanced over the previous mix of unkept trees and the initial proposed single layer of evergreens.

Again, we regret the mistake and we will work to ensure it is not repeated.

Sincerely,
The Long Lots Building Committee

Planning & Zoning, Zoning Board Of Appeals: What’s The Difference?

Westporters may not yet know who they’re voting for, in the coming election.

But the jobs that candidates are running for are pretty straightforward.

The Board of Finance handles finances. The Board of Education covers education. The Board of Selectmen/women (or better, “Selectors”) is, by New England tradition, our executive branch.

But what’s the difference between the Planning & Zoning Commission, and the Zoning Board of Appeals? That can be confusing.

Michelle Perillie — director of Westport’s Planning & Zoning Department — gives us the breakdown. She says:

In Westport, Planning & Zoning is a department within the town government.

It’s overseen by the 7-member Planning & Zoning Commission. Elected by voters, they regulate land use and development. By state law, the commission is responsible for developing and updating the Town Plan of Conservation and Development every 10 years, enforcing zoning ordinances to control land use, and approving applications for new construction and development projects.

The Planning & Zoning Commission’s mission is to promote public health, safety and welfare, prevent overcrowding, and ensure that adequate infrastructure and public services are available to support growth.

The P&Z’s work often involves striking a balance between progress and preservation. The public can influence Westport’s future by electing commissioners who share their vision for how the town should grow.

Planning & Zoning Commissioners are elected every two years.  This year, 4 candidates are running for 3 open seats.

The Zoning Board of Appeals, meanwhile, is a state-mandated board required in any municipality with a zoning commission.

The ZBA is a quasi-judicial board of 5 elected members, acting primarily as a “safety valve” for the zoning regulations. The ZBA can grant variances from the zoning regulations when an applicant demonstrates a hardship.

The ZBA also has the power to hear and decide appeals from decisions of the zoning enforcement officer, and in limited cases where authorized by regulation, determines when to issue special permits.

To prevail at the ZBA, an applicant must receive the concurring vote of 4 board members.

Elections for ZBA members are held every two years.  This year, there are 3 candidates for 2 open seats.

Roundup: Politics & The Environment, Diwali & The School Calendar …

Monday’s first selectman candidates’ discussion on sustainability and the environment drew an overflow crowd to Christ & Holy Trinity Church — and a commitment from all 3 to create and adopt a comprehensive Westport Sustainability Plan, within their first year in office.

That’s a milestone long sought by local environmental activists.

Representative Town Meeting member Clarence Hayes was at the event, hosted by Sustainable Westport and Earthplace. He reports:

Over 90 minutes of spirited questioning, moderator Peter Boyd — a lecturer and resident fellow at Yale’s Center for Business and the Environment — pressed candidates Don O’Day, David Rosenwaks and Kevin Christie on their personal engagement with sustainability, their records, and their plans to make Westport a leader in environmental action.

All 3 voiced support for sustainability priorities, including improved walkability, stronger flood resilience, enforcement of the leaf-blower ban, rebuilding the community garden, pursuing Sustainable CT Gold certification, and evaluating solar installations for Staples High School and town parking lots, among others.

While short on detailed road maps, the shared commitment to adopt a formal plan within the first year marked an important first step. None pledged to add dedicated staff immediately, preferring to rely on volunteer expertise and integrate sustainability goals into existing town departments — and to see what progress can be achieved this way first.

When asked how they hoped to be remembered after four years, O’Day said for “a willingness to be first, not just a follower.” Rosenwaks envisioned “a town known for a healthy lifestyle — walking, biking, and clean air and water.” Christie hoped Westport would “become a leader again on the environment, as it once was.”

The conversation continued informally at Emmy Squared, where candidates and residents carried the debate — and Westport’s hopes for a sustainable future — well into the evening.

==================================================

Will Westport have a new school holiday?

A petition to add Diwali to the calendar has gained several dozen signatures.

It says: “I am a proud member of the Hindu community in Westport. Every year my family and I celebrate Diwali, the Festival of Lights, with great joy and reverence. Diwali symbolizes the victory of light over darkness and good over evil, offering a time for reflection, community, and spreading love. As a Hindu, it holds deep cultural and spiritual significance for me and millions of others around the world.

“On October 1, 2025, Diwali was officially recognized as a state holiday in Connecticut. This acknowledgment is a huge step forward in embracing and celebrating the cultural diversity that enriches our state.

“Our community takes pride in our cultural diversity and our commitment to inclusivity. By declaring Diwali a school holiday, Westport can send a strong message of acceptance and celebrate the rich tapestry of communities within the town.

“I urge the Westport Board of Education to recognize Diwali as an official school holiday. Doing so will not only reflect the values of our inclusive community but also respect the cultural practices of Hindu families living in Westport. This change can serve as an inspiration and positive example for other towns and school districts in Connecticut.”

This year, Hindus celebrate Diwali on October 21.

Diwali: The Festival of Lights.

==================================================

Speaking of the Board of Education: They meet tomorrow (Thursday, 7 p.m., Staples High School cafeteria).

The main agenda item is a discussion of the phone-free implementation plan.

==================================================

When “06880” last checked in on Dylan Gleicher and Neil Sono, the 2017 and ’18 Staples High School graduates (respectively) had created an app — Prepared 911 — that enabled school employees to seamlessly share information with each other during shootings and other crises. They soon expanded it to focus on 911 centers, police and fire departments, and sheriff’s offices.

With early hire Chris Scherban (Staples ‘17), Prepared quickly became a leader in assistive AI technology for public safety agencies.

Their $16 million Series A funding round was led by Andreessen Horowitz.

Last week, the longtime friends sold Prepared 911 to Axon, a global public safety technology company.

Neil Soni and Dylan Gleicher, in their Yale days.

=================================================

Speaking of Staples students’ achievements: On Saturday, the top 7 members of the school’s boys cross country team competed in the 26th annual Great American XC Festival in Cary, North Carolina.

The competition draws runners from across the country to the fast WakeMed Course..

Staples competed in the varsity blue 5k race. They scored 228 points, good for a team win.

Congratulations to Oliver Samuel (15:57), Harrison Sydor (16:05), Luke Cooper (16:22), Jackson Wood (16:25), Oscar Jones (17:08), Samuel Burmeister (17:16) and Maxwell Benke (17:25).

Coming up: the FCIAC championship, at New Canaan’s Waveny Park. For more Staples cross country information, click here. 

The 2025 Staples boys cross country team, in North Carolina.

=================================================

Westport is becoming the Naples of America.

First came Massi Co — Massimo Tullio’s new restaurant, with Neapolitan cuisine.

Now Stephen Kempson London — the high-end tailor on Post Road West, just over the Ruth Steinkraus Cohen Bridge — is sponsoring a 2-day trunk show celebrating the artistry and heritage of that city’s craftsmanship.

The genesis for the October 17 (1 to 5 p.m.) and 18 (10 a.m. to 4 p.m.) event was Kempson’s trip to Naples earlier this year. He was inspired by its devotion to beauty, precision, and passion — qualities found in its cuisine, architecture, and menswear tradition.

Three celebrated artisans will be in Westport

  • Paolo Scafora: Master shoemaker since 1956, known for hand-stitched footwear.
  • Gennaro Sannino: The house of Sannino shirts.
  • Anthony Lonzano (Gabo Napoli): Representing one of Italy’s leading tailoring houses.

Each will showcase signature pieces and take bespoke orders.

==================================================

Westport Library executive director Bill Harmer addressed the Westport Rotary Club yesterday. His topic was close to his heart: the Common Ground Initiative.

Recent Common Ground speakers have included Ken Feinberg, who ran the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund, and former Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri.

The Common Ground Initiative also includes the Seat at the Table series, where community members discuss intriguing topics.

“Americans regard libraries as one of the last safe spaces in our democracy,” Harmer said.

Bill Harmer, at the Westport Rotary Club (Photo/Dave Matlow)

==================================================

Early yesterday morning, Westport firefighters responded to a structure fire on Hillspoint Road.

The blaze was discovered by 2 passersby. They notified the home’s occupants, who evacuated before Fire Department units arrived. The fire was contained to the exterior area of origin.

The scene was turned over to the Westport fire marshal’s office for investigation.

=================================================

Staples High School Class of 1971 graduate Lynn Barber Mellor died on September 13 in Lake Wales, Florida. She was 72.

She was born in Chicago to Gordon and Jean A. Mellor. Lynn and her family moved to Westport when she was 7 months old. She attended California College of Arts & Crafts in Oakland, then worked as a graphic artist for marketing Corporation of America in Westport.

An avid scratchboard artist, she retired to Key West in 2006, then to Lake Wales in 2021.

Lynn is survived by her twin sister Gail M. Sibley (Jack), of Poinciana, Florida; brother Mark (Debbie) of Dorset, Vermont; niece Alyssa and nephew Devin. She was predeceased by her parents, her nephew Jes Sibley, and her stepmother, Shirley Mellor.

A private service will be held.

Lynn Mellor

=================================================

Today’s “Westport … Naturally” photo is one more full moon image. This was one was taken at Burying Hill Beach.

It’s the last, we promise.

Until next month.

(Photo/Anne Bernier)

==================================================

And finally … in honor of (perhaps) the next Westport Public Schools holiday (story above):

(Where else but “06880” can you read about Diwali, political candidates, a life-saving app — and much more — all at once? Nowhere else! So please click here to support our work. Thanks!)

 

Long Lots Neighbor: Demolition Goes Far Beyond P&Z Approval

For 3 years Julianne Mulvey attended meetings, made phone calls and wrote letters about the Long Lots Elementary School building project.

As the closest neighbor south of the Hyde Lane site — with a home abutting the former Community Gardens — she wanted to be sure that her rights as a property owner were considered.

She and her husband Fran made compromises. They also made sure the Long Lots School Building Committee included elements like buffer zones in the design.

The first phase of construction began last week. On the very first day, carefully drawn plans were disregarded.

The buffer area, with before-and-after photos.

Specifically, the couple said in a letter Monday to the Planning & Zoning Commission:

Representatives of the LLSBC assured us that clearance along our property line would occur at the greater of the flagged 25 feet from property lines or areas essential to the approved site plan. That is not what transpired.

The most egregious clearance has occurred between the main construction road and our front yard. We were explicitly assured by the LLSBC that this area would remain as undisturbed as possible, while still allowing access to the site.

While the construction road was positioned the maximum distance from our home, the demolition crew nonetheless destroyed an estimated 6,000 square feet of mature vegetation and growth beyond the construction road — our home’s primary buffer from the project site.

This area is not part of the construction plan or existing future plans for the site and did not need to be cleared for the project to proceed. The fact that the area lies outside the fence enclosure of the construction site further underscores this point: It did not need to be destroyed.

Despite our repeated and consistent concerns voiced over the past 3 years, the LLSBC proceeded in direct opposition to both its own assurances and the conditions of P&Z approval, which specifically required that our property be taken into consideration.

In addition, certain areas were cleared within as little as 15 feet of the property line — though a walkthrough with the LLSBC identified flags at 25 feet that were meant to preserve the buffer.

The effects on their quality of life — and property values — have been devastating.

“We have spoken repeatedly in the last 12 months about our fear that demolition would occur without a town representative on hand for us to speak with immediately,” the couple said in the letter to the P&Z.

On the first day of construction, there was no representative of the town on site — “only construction workers doing their job with understandably no authority to speak with us.”

After seeing the letter, “06880” reached out to Julianne Mulvey.

She said that on Monday, Susan Chipouras — project manager for the LLSBC — knocked on their door. (Mulvey noted that Chipouras had tried to contact them earlier.)

Chipouras first blamed a utility company. Mulvey said that they had removed only one tree.

Chipouras acknowledged the gravity of the clearance, and implied it was a third party mistake.

“It was the first day of a $100 million project,” Mulvey said. “And no one was there from the LLSBC to oversee the removal of this sensitive buffer area.

“On the first morning the project began, everything we had been promised was gone.”

(Photos and graphics courtesy of Fran and Julianne Mulvey)

Before last week, the Mulveys could not even see the school. Now they live adjacent to a construction zone.

And they can see everything.

“Our skepticism regarding the LLSBC’s promises to take ‘only what is necessary’ (a quote from chair Jay Keenan during a formal walkthrough with neighbors in August) regrettably, has been validated,” the Mulveys’ letter said.

“We no longer have confidence in the town’s ability to manage this project.”

Chipouras proposed plantings to minimize the effect of the removal.

But, Mulvey said, “the damage is done. It is on the LLSBC and the town to fix this mistake.”

 

P&Z Hears Downtown Parking Pre-Application

Forty-four fewer spaces in Parker Harding Plaza. Twenty more in the Imperial Avenue lot.

More greenery and walking paths at Imperial Avenue and Jesup Green — including turning Taylor Place into a pedestrian zone.

No parking garage at the Baldwin lot. At least, not yet.

Redesign of the Imperial Avenue parking lot. View is looking north, toward the pedestrian bridge to the Levitt Pavilion (left).

Those were key takeaways from last night’s Planning & Zoning Commission meeting.

Public Works Department director Pete Ratkiewich presented a pre-application to the commissioners, for the long-debated, oft-delayed downtown parking-and-more plan. (Click here for a link to construction and other materials for Parker Harding.)

It was a cordial meeting. Commissioners asked questions. Ratkiewich and Downtown Plan Implementation Committee chair Randy Herbertson answered them.

After nearly 2 hours, a consensus was reached: Officials will continue planning.

And the P&Z will welcome them back for another meeting.

Ratkiewich’s goal, he said, was to show that with a parking management strategy, downtown can withstand the loss of 44 “core” spaces. Meanwhile, he added, improved pedestrian and river access — and compliance (now lacking) with Americans with Disabilities Act standards — will make all of downtown more pleasant, and also more accessible.

Artist’s rendering of more green space by Jesup Green and the Saugatuck River.

The Public Works director’s appearance came a year after the Representative Town Meeting nixed a plan to add parking spaces by cutting into Jesup Green, sending planners back to the drawing board.

Plans on that drawing board now show enhancements to the “non-core” parking areas: Jesup Green and Imperial Avenue. Those include riverfront seating,  connectivity between the 2 areas (including a mile-long pedestrian loop), and possible outdoor tables in the short area connecting the lower library parking lot with Post Road East.

Taylor Place could become a pedestrian area. View is from Post Road East, looking to the library. Tonic & Green is on the left.

Two benefits to that proposal: better integration between the “cultural” part of downtown and the shopping district, and better traffic flow on the Post Road, by removing that Taylor Place traffic light.

While the lower library (Taylor) lot would lose 10 parking spots — going from 75 spaces to 65 — those 10 would be reclaimed by reconfiguring parking on Jesup Road.

Renovations to the Imperial Avenue lot would include 16 more parking slots, a bathroom and storage space, a walkway with kayak launch, and bike racks.

Improvements to the Imperial Avenue lot include walkways and (rear) a bathroom.

The third part of Ratkiewich’s presentation involved Parker Harding. A parking study — conducted last year during late summer, mid-fall and the holiday season — showed that downtown parking is most full only during a 2-hour period, Ratkiewich said: 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. (Click here for the parking study.)

That “2-hour parking problem” could be managed, he said, with a “proper parking plan.”

The best option, he noted, is modifying parking times — something that has already been done. Off-street parking is now 3 hours; previously, there were 2- and 3-hour limits. The average shopper spends 2-3 hours downtown, Ratkiewich said.

On-street parking — primarily Main Street — is now 2 hours. “That’s only a small percentage” of all available parking, Ratkiewich said.

The impacts of those changes are being evaluated.

Planned improvements to the lower library (Taylor) parking lot.

There are a few changes proposed for Parker Harding. They include improved entrances and exits; perpendicular parking, and 7 ADA-compliant spots

As for a parking deck: Consultants said the Baldwin lot (off Elm Street) is the only feasible location. A 1-level deck would cost $5 million; the “best bang for the buck” is 3 levels, for $10 million.

But, Ratkiewich said, a deck would address only “the problem of 2 hours, at peak time.”

His and DPIC’s recommendations, following up on the current Phase 1 (adjust parking times, and monitor effects), in this order:

  • Metered parking in high-demand areas (to incentivize free parking outside those areas)
  • Selling permits to employees, for all-day parking
  • A parking structure, only if the above steps do not work.

Parker Harding would be the first priority, followed by the Imperial Avenue lot. Jesup Green would be third.

P&Z commissioners’ comments were muted. Amy Wistreich praised the “holistic approach” and walking paths, but cautioned against lifting previous restrictions until the plan is complete.

Michael Cammeer said, “You’re on to something. Let’s try to mitigate any controversy.”

And Michael Calise noted, “If we can get 30 employees to park outside the core, that will solve the problem.”

“Where We Stand”: P&Z Candidates Describe Their Skill Sets

An informed electorate is the greatest bulwark of democracy.

Westporters understand this is a very important election. “06880” is doing our part, to help Westporters understand candidates’ perspectives on a variety of issues.

Once a week, between now and Election Day, we’ll ask the men and women running for 3 important boards — Selectmen/women, Planning & Zoning, and Education — one specific question.

We’ll print their responses verbatim.

This week’s question for the Planning & Zoning Commission is:

What skill sets do you have that would complement or enhance the P&Z as a whole?

==================================================

The Democratic Party has endorsed Michael Cammeyer, Bre Injeski and Craig Schiavone. Schiavone is also running on the Coalition for Westport ticket, and has been endorsed by the Alliance for Westport. They say:

Instead of drafting 400 words each, we are submitting a combined post to represent all 3 of us running as a slate.

Michael Cammeyer, Bre Injeski and Craig Schiavone bring diverse yet complementary skills in law, civic service and planning. From infrastructure to 8-30g housing to coastal resilience, Westport faces real challenges. Our team brings the necessary collective experience to ensure decisions that are fair, transparent, and right for Westport’s.

Michael Cammeyer, Bre Injeski and Craig Schiavone

Michael Cammeyer
Michael ensures that all voices are heard, including those expressing unpopular or minority views. That’s not accidental; that’s leadership. He brings a long record of civic engagement and leadership in Westport, always focused on bringing people together and finding consensus.

His service on town boards and committees has given him a deep understanding of how different parts of local government work together – and where the P&Z can make a difference.  For example, Michael successfully promoted the regulation change necessary to ensure female athletes will have equitable access to lit fields.

Known for being thoughtful, approachable, and able to bridge perspectives, he strengthens the Commission’s ability to balance community input with responsible growth. His collaborative style makes him a strong complement to the team. When it comes to drainage, Michael is always the first to make sure the water flows in the right direction. Michael approaches his role with quiet confidence and careful consideration. He doesn’t speak the most, but when he does, it counts – and that is what makes him an effective leader.

Bre Injeski
Bre brings a unique combination of legal expertise in government ethics and transportation policy, with hands-on experience as a current P&Z alternate.

A Georgetown Law graduate, she has nearly 20 years of public and private sector experience focused on municipal and administrative law. As a transportation regulatory lawyer, she advises on compliance, strategic planning and policy — skills that translate directly to applying zoning rules fairly and consistently.

Previously, as ethics officer for the New York city comptroller and as deputy director of enforcement at the NYC Conflicts of Interest Board, she oversaw government ethics enforcement, which gave her a deep appreciation for neutrality, transparency, and public trust in government decision-making. Combined with her practical service on the P&Z, her background ensures decisions are legally sound, and grounded in Westport’s current challenges and opportunities.

Craig Schiavone
Craig brings a strong professional background in community planning, historic preservation, real estate finance, business and project management — expertise that is essential for understanding the economic implications of development and ensuring projects are both viable and aligned with community goals.

A Westport resident for more than 20 years, she has played a central role in shaping local planning efforts, including serving as co-chair of the Saugatuck Transit-Oriented Development Master Plan Commission, and as an appointee to both the Downtown Westport 2020 Task Force and the 2022 Downtown Implementation Committee.

Craig has worked closely with residents and business owners, giving her a grounded sense of how zoning decisions impact daily life in Westport. Her ability to analyze projects from both a practical and financial perspective adds another critical dimension to the Commission’s deliberations.

Deeply committed to community service, Craig serves as a guardian ad litem with Child Advocates of Connecticut, a mentor with Homes for Hope, and a volunteer with the Westport Public Library. She has also held leadership roles with organizations advancing historic preservation, the arts, and child welfare.

Together
As a slate, we offer legal, civic, and financial expertise.  This is a balance that ensures decisions are fair, transparent, community-oriented, and economically sound. We each bring a different lens, and together we will strengthen the Commission’s ability to address housing, traffic, environmental resilience, and Westport’s long-term character. On election day, vote all 3 for P&Z.

==================================================

Michele Paquette is a bipartisan candidate, with endorsements from 3 organizations. She will be listed on the ballot under both the Republican Party and The Coalition for Westport. Additionally, she has earned the support of the Westport Alliance for Saugatuck. She says:

I’m honored to be a candidate for the Planning and Zoning Commission, driven by a desire to serve and contribute to a town I truly love.  Throughout my life and career I’ve thrived on learning, engaging others, solving complex problems, and collaborating to find thoughtful solutions. I’ve always believed in the power of collective effort to produce tangible, lasting results.

I bring personal land use experience through limited partnerships and a real estate business outside Westport. Now retired, I offer decades of strategic business leadership, including serving as general manager of a billion-dollar business and global leader of a multi-billion-dollar enterprise.

These roles sharpened my ability to evaluate complex proposals, lead teams through high-stakes decisions, work through legal and regulatory concerns, and implement systems that ensure accountability and progress. I believe this blend of land use and experience will enhance the commission’s ability to navigate increasingly complex development challenges.

Michele Paquette 

Planning and zoning decisions shape the future of our town. They require technical expertise, ethical judgment, and a respect for public input. These are values I’ve lived by since my upbringing in Michigan, where my father was a union member and my mother led a hospital department. I was taught that honesty matters, accountability is essential, and hard work lays the foundation for meaningful progress. I was also taught to treat others with respect, collaborate generously, and never shy away from a challenge.

I believe in listening — not just hearing words, but understanding what individuals are truly saying. That’s where I differ from an incumbent candidate.

When hundreds of residents voiced concerns about an 800% increase in density in the Saugatuck area, they were asking for balance. The residents supported a 200–400% increase, but their concerns about the impact on the small-town feel, traffic and parking were ignored. The large zoning change was approved, including by an incumbent candidate, and this made The Hamlet development possible.

During final straw votes on The Hamlet, 2 incumbent candidates indicated approval for the project despite months of public opposition by thousands. Then, when it came time to vote, they abstained. I respect their service, but I believe residents deserve courageous decision-making. I will take a stand.

When I evaluate a project, I ask: Is it complete? Is it compliant? Does it serve the town’s long-term interests?

The Hamlet was not a complete application. It lacked over 80-plus conditions—for example, the plan didn’t provide employee parking even though it was requested.  This is the largest development Westport has ever faced and it is in the midst of our main commuting hub. It deserved thorough scrutiny and a clear, principled response. The plan was eventually denied—but not by the two incumbents’ candidates who initially voted to approve.

I’ve heard from over 1,000 residents about development concerns. I’ve studied the 2017 Town Plan of Conservation and Development and the 2012 Affordable Housing Plan. I’ve attended countless commission meetings and engaged with boards including Affordable Housing, Architectural Review, Erosion and Control, Conservation, and Parks and Recreation. I have studied the regulations and process. I look forward to learning more. I am ready to give residents what they expect: transparency, accountability, and results.

I’m running to be a leader of change – a proactive, principled voice for Westport residents. My business acumen, collaborative spirit, land use experience, and local engagement position me to serve with integrity, courage, and clarity. I’m here to work with all commissioners, regardless of party, to deliver on what residents want—and to ensure our town grows in a way that’s smart, sustainable, and community-driven.

I would be honored to serve.

==================================================

For last week’s “Where We Stand” question, click here.