Tag Archives: Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

Free Sherwood Island!

Overlooked in the blizzard of news following the passage of our state’s last-in-the-nation budget is this:

Starting January 1, Connecticut residents will no longer pay for admission to 24 state parks and 3 state forests.

It’s covered through a new Department of Motor Vehicles charge: $10, paid every 2 years.

If you’re like me, and fail to see a connection between the DMV and the Department of Environmental and Energy Protection, look at the bottom line: The new charge will raise $16 million of the $18 million needed for annual operation of the parks.

Fees collected will be kept separate from Connecticut’s general fund.

Shewood Island State Park: 232 acres of prime real estate, right here in Westport.

What does that mean for Westport?

For one thing, Sherwood Island — the often-overlooked 232-acre gem right inside our borders — might get a few more town visitors.

For another, I’m sure someone will suggest that the solution to our Compo Beach crowds is to shunt more out-of-towners to the state park.

Of course, free admission applies only to Connecticut residents. Whether at Sherwood Island or Compo, New Yorkers still have to pay.

Annual Beach Replenishment Project Washes Away

Alert “06880” reader — and longtime Westport observer — Chip Stephens writes:

Those of us who have been around a while remember that not so long ago, Sherwood Mill Pond neighbors had the sand in front of their houses replenished once a year. A barge would recover sand washed into Compo Cove from their beaches by storms and high tides. Big Kowalsky front-end loaders spread it out, recovering private beaches up and down the cove.

In recent years, the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection has restricted that activity. You can see what’s happened by not replenishing the beaches from Hillspoint Road. Landowners see it more painfully from their windows.

Old Mill "Beach." (Photo/Chip Stephens)

Old Mill “Beach.” (Photo/Chip Stephens)

We’ve long been told that the reason the sand washes away is that the Army Corps of Engineers made errors when they replaced reefs and stones on Sherwood Island and Compo Beach. That caused misdirection of natural currents, sweeping away sand on those local beaches into the Mill Cove flats.

Now the landowners face difficulties with DEEP and local boards in placing erosion controls, walls or reefs to save their beach, their land and their houses.

DEEP’s answer is to plant the beach with grasses and plantings. Unfortuantely, even modest storms wash them away.

What will happen? Well, time and tide wait for no man…

Bear With Us

A big black bear’s weekend ramble through Westport elicited plenty of chatter. There were blog posts,  Facebook photos, some bad puns (see headline above), and predictable jokes about what bears do in the woods.

But lurking behind all the heh-heh-I’m-not-worried comments are serious issues.

An “06880” reader — who has had extended conversations with the Merritt Parkway Conservancy and state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection — emailed me with several concerns.

“State urban forest experts have suggested that deforestation of the Merritt Parkway, and clear-cutting for large developments like the new YMCA at Mahackeno, will result in more wildlife venturing into residential areas from previously forested areas.

“And a black bear appears in backyards soon after.”

The bear, on Tupelo Road.

The bear, on Tupelo Road.

“Although a bear may be categorized as a singular public safety issue, it should be considered in context with other issues,” the reader continues.

“Reduction of urban forest  in suburban communities ultimately results in other public safety issues. For instance, Westport is wedged between 2 significant diesel fume corridors. Particulate matter from both the Merritt and I-95  corridors is filtered by the urban forest.” Increased levels of asthma may result.

Clear-cutting dangerous trees on the Merritt Parkway solves one problem. But traffic jams -- due to tree work, accidents or just plain rush hour -- brings other environmental problems.

Clear-cutting dangerous trees on the Merritt Parkway solves one problem. But traffic jams — due to tree work, accidents or just plain rush hour — brings other environmental problems.

The reader also worries that after large parcels of land are deforested, they are paved with conventional asphalt — not modern “pervious paving,” which reduces runoff, traps suspended solids, and filters pollutants from the water.

“Certainly we cannot solve everything instantly,” the reader acknowledges.

“The bear is not the primary issue. But it could be an example of cause and effect specific to Merritt Parkway and Mahackeno deforestation. We need to identify issues as they arise, and together plan viable strategies for urban forest management.”

Important Info — Floodplain Damage

The following information — from the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection — was sent to all municipal officials. It was forwarded to “06880” by Cathy Walsh, chair of the Westport Planning & Zoning Commission, on behalf of the entire P&Z.  She says:

The highlights are the 100-year flood plain, 3-foot substantial damage clause and the $30,000 grant.  The key for homeowners is “document everything.  Photos of high water/high water marks are invaluable. So are photos of pre-existing sea walls.”

The P&Z staff are discussing the options internally as to how to stream line the process for homeowners to rebuild.  I’ve asked them to come up with recommendations as to how best streamline the process for homeowners. We will put this on the agenda for the November 8 P&Z meeting.

The other important issue concerns seawalls.  Larry Bradley is working with the DEEP commissioner to streamline that process also.  We want the public to know what’s going on but at the same time please allow us to do our leg work.

The DEEP memo follow:

In the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, many structures have been damaged by coastal flooding, high winds, fire from downed electrical wires, or fallen trees.

All Connecticut municipalities participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Under the NFIP, structures located in the mapped 100-year floodplain that have sustained substantial damage must be brought into compliance with your community’s floodplain management regulations or ordinance as if it is new construction when they are repaired or reconstructed, including the requirement that lowest floor be elevated to or above the base flood elevation.

The NFIP defines substantial damage as damage from ANY origin sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before-damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. Work on structures that are determined to be substantially damaged is considered to be a substantial improvement, regardless of the actual repair work performed. The definition of market value is included in your local floodplain management zoning regulations or flood ordinance. Usually, market value is defined as the appraised value of the structure, excluding land value.

Before issuing permits for repairs, local permit officials must determine whether damage to a structure located in the 100-year floodplain qualifies as “substantial damage”. Community officials often have difficulty determining whether buildings are substantially damaged. This difficulty is magnified after a disaster where a large number of buildings have been damaged and there is a need to provide timely substantial damage determinations and issuance of permits so that reconstruction can begin.

In coastal areas that experience tidal surge, a general rule of thumb is that if 3 feet or more of flood water has entered the first floor living space (not the basement), the structure has likely hit the substantial damage threshold. The Substantial Damage Estimator Manual listed below contains helpful damage category spreadsheets in Appendix E. While doing field inspections, it may be helpful to do a preliminary assessment using spreadsheets using a “stoplight” screening for each structure (green – not substantially damaged, yellow – borderline, red-substantially damaged). More detailed calculations can be done in the future before the structure is repaired.

There are many Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) publications that can assist local officials with the topic of substantial damage. Below is a list of these resources and link to website.

Substantial Damage Estimator (FEMA P-784 CD) and User’s Manual and Workbook http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=4166

Answers to Questions About Substantially Damaged Buildings (FEMA 213) http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=1636

Substantial Improvement/Substantial Damage Desk Reference (FEMA P-758) http://www.fema.gov/library/viewRecord.do?id=4160

Managing Floodplain Development through the NFIP, Unit 8 (IS-9) http://www.fema.gov/pdf/floodplain/is_9_complete.pdf#nameddest=sub-damage

When buildings undergo repair following a substantial damage determination, it is an opportunity for the community to reduce future damage to these vulnerable structures through compliance with community floodplain management regulations.

If a local official determines a structure is substantially damaged, Increased Cost of Compliance (ICC) coverage is part of most standard flood insurance policies. If eligible, ICC provides for up to $30,000 to help property owners who have been substantially damaged bring the home or business into compliance with community floodplain regulations or ordinances. This can include elevation, demolition or relocation of a residential structure, or flood-proofing a non-residential structure. Claims for ICC benefits are filed separately from your claim for contents or building loss. Below is a link to FEMA’s website with more information in ICC. http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/floodplain/ICC.shtm