Tag Archives: Banana Republic

Photo Challenge #513

Back in the day, there was a Main Street restaurant called the Townly.

Artist Ed Ashe decorated the wall with a WPA-style mural, showing various characters cavorting in 1930-ish ways.

Eventually, the Town became Klein’s. As the small stationery shop grew into a larger department store — with books, records, cameras, typewriters, office furniture and more — the mural was hidden.

And forgotten.

Not until years later — after Klein’s closed, and the new tenant Banana Republic began renovations — was the lost and long-forgotten artwork uncovered.

To its credit, the large clothing chain kept the mural. It did not fit with the décor, but — hanging behind the registers — it offered a cool bit of Westport history,

In time Banana Republic closed too. Fortunately, Oka — a British clothing store — retained the now-iconic work.

Oka has now joined its predecessors as a Main Street memory. Soon, Sushijin will move in.

Judging from the interior work being done, the new restaurant will honor the original one by keeping the near-century-old mural.

All of which is to give the back story to last week’s Photo Challenge (click here to see). 

Thirteen readers — one of whom had actually been inside the Townly, as a child — knew exactly what the challenge showed. Congratulations to Pam Barkentin, Fred Cantor, David Meth, Jonathan McClure, Andrew Colabella, Jane Nordli, Seth Schachter, Diane Bosch, Jennie G. Pickering, Janet Freedman, Janet Albert, Michael Simso and Shirlee Gordon.

Today’s Photo Challenge is a seasonal one. If you know where in Westport you’d see this, click “Comments” below.

(Photo/Ed Simek)

(Every Sunday, “06880” hosts this Photo Challenge. We challenge you too to support your hyper-local blog. Please click here to make a tax-deductible contribution. Thank you!)

Totally Uncool: The Sequel

The other day, I wrote about stores on Main Street whose front doors are wide open, blasting air conditioning onto the sidewalk. The idea is to lure hot customers inside.

Okay, I lied. It was not “the other day.”

It was June 5, 2012 — exactly 12 years ago today. You can click here to read that post. (Spoiler alert: It was cleverly titled “Totally Uncool.”)

I’ve been writing about that environmentally wasteful, economically dumb and ridiculously absurd practice ever since.

Right on cue yesterday, Tracy Porosoff emailed “06880.” She sent this photo …

(Photo/Tracy Porosoff)

… and wrote: “As the weather gets warmer and our stores have their air conditioning on, I wonder what the rules are about keeping their doors closed.

“I was just on Main Street. They are all doing it.”

The Main Street stores who insist on this practice change. (Remember Banana Republic? BCBG? Douglas?)

But the problem remains.

And worsens.

In the 12 years since that first post — and every year after, when I’ve repeated a similar one — the planet has grown more endangered. It was 126 degrees in Asia this week, and we’re on track for the hottest summer ever this year.

Fortunately, it wasn’t that hot here yesterday. In fact, it wasn’t hot at all.

The temperature did not reach 80. There were clouds all afternoon.

But there those stores were, front doors spread wide, a/c pumping relentlessly into the street.

Banana Republic, June 5, 2012. They are no longer in business here.

Enough is enough.

Westporters have spent 12 years asking stores to close their doors. It hasn’t worked.

Some managers comply. A couple of days (or hours) later, they open them again.

Some say, “Sorry. It’s corporate policy.”

Let’s tell those managers, “I’m not going to shop here until you close your doors. And keep them closed.”

If they mumble something about corporate policy, ask for the corporate number.

And hey, this is Westport. Someone here probably knows the CEO. Call him or her directly.

If none of that works, there’s always the RTM.

Our legislative body was one of the first to ban plastic bags. They’ve tackled leaf blowers.

Now it’s time to craft an ordinance forbidding retail doors to remain open wide during business hours.

With hefty fines, per day.

How cool would that be?

Banana Republic Peels Away

Add another vacancy to Main Street — and it’s a big one.

Banana Republic is closing January 10.

That’s all a store manager would say. She’s not allowed to give her name, she says — “company policy.”

What’s the reason? “The company decided to close us.” In 2017, Gap Inc. — the parent company — announced plans to shut about 200 “under-performing” Gap and Banana Republic stores.

Will they reopen elsewhere? “I’m not sure.”

How long have they been in the iconic storefront that for decades housed Klein’s Department store? “I’m not allowed to give that information out.”

An “06880” reader says a sales clerk told her their rent was tripled.

But that’s just the word on the (soon-to-be-empty #44 Main) Street.

Banana Republic on Main Street.

The Next Battle? Landlord Blasts Proposal Limiting Downtown Space

Next Thursday (February 27, 7 p.m., Town Hall) the Planning & Zoning Commission will review Text Amendment 672. It would limit the size of commercial tenant spaces in the Business Center District and Business Center District/Historic to no more than 10,000 square feet. The amendment would also preclude the merger of commercial properties or tenant spaces across property lines within these 2 zones.

At least 1 downtown landlord opposes the change. Writing to fellow property owners, the landlord says that passage “could have long-term negative effects on our downtown,” and on future property values.

The landlord continues:

In its simplest form, this amendment would prohibit a single building/landlord, who has a property with more than 10,000 square feet of leasable retail space (either on one level or multiple levels), from combining spaces to allow for a new 10,000 s/f or greater tenant. This applies to reconfiguring existing spaces as well as new projects within the 2 zones — essentially all of downtown Westport.  This  would apply if a single landlord or multiple landlords with adjoining properties wanted to do the same.

The 3-story Gap replaced a failed vertical mall -- which was built on the site of a furniture store that burned down in the mid-1970s.

The 3-story Gap replaced a failed vertical mall — which was built on the site of a furniture store that burned down in the mid-1970s.

The landlord says the following examples would have happened if this amendment was already on the books:

  •  Banana Republic could not occupy its current location.
  • Acadia would have been prohibited from combining 3 floors of retail at 125 Main Street to allow the Gap to move in.
  • Restoration Hardware would not have been allowed to occupy its current space.

In the future:

  •  If Tiffany wants to expand to the 2nd floor retail space above it, it could not.
  •  If Nike wants to expand into the adjacent Allen Edmonds/Theory/Lulu space, it could not.
  •  If Brooks Brothers wants to expand into the adjacent William-Sonoma space, it could not.
  •  If a single tenant wants all of the first floor of 180 Post Road East (the Michele’s Pies building), it could not happen.
One tenant could not take over the 1st floor of 180 Post Road East, according to proposed regulations. (Photo/Cushman & Wakefield)

One tenant could not take over the 1st floor of 180 Post Road East, according to proposed regulations. (Photo/Cushman & Wakefield)

In addition to those individual landlord examples, the downtown property owner says that “multiple landlords crossing lot lines and combining spaces” could also be affected. For example:

  • When Barney’s was in Westport, it expanded its men’s department by breaking through a 2nd floor party wall/lot line, creating a 15,000 s/f store (2 landlords, 2 properties).
  • Talbots expanded its brand by breaking through a party wall/lot line, taking over the old Remarkable Book Store and creating a single 12,500 s/f store.

The landlord writes, “Our P&Z thinks this will create an environment that is more friendly to ‘mom and pop’ businesses. This is not the case. It will only discourage all commercial activity in downtown Westport. Would you lease a space that is 8,000 square feet with an interest in expanding, when you know you cannot go over 10,000?”

The landlord concludes, “There are many ways to encourage economic diversity within our downtown area. However, a regulation change at this point is premature, especially without consideration of any alternatives. This proposal is a knee-jerk reaction to a perceived problem that does not exist.”

“06880” readers — property owners, shoppers, whomever — do you agree or disagree? Hit “comments” to weigh in. NOTE: Because the landlord has asked not to be identified by name, anonymous comments will be allowed for this post only. However, please keep all remarks civil and on target!

Totally Uncool

As we worry about the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, how many of us think about our own waste here in Westport?

From 1 spot on Main Street today — with the temperature near 90 — I saw 4 stores with their doors wide open.

Air conditioning was on full blast — luring customers with the promise of a refreshing shopping experience, while wreaking havoc on the environment.

True, it’s not 2 million gallons a day.  But it’s energy just the same.

Banana Republic

Douglas

BCBG

Blue Mercury