Larry Weisman is a longtime Westport resident, an attorney and a civic volunteer with many causes.
Intrigued by this morning’s “06880” post about “No Through Trucks” on the Cribari Bridge, he writes:
It is my thoroughly unscientific perception that, except for those who view the Cribari Bridge as a historic artifact which needs repair but should be preserved in its present configuration, a sizeable number of Westporters would favor its being replaced by a state of the art structure which will improve traffic flow and accommodate pedestrians and cyclists — provided only that 18-wheelers and similar large trucks can be prevented from accessing the bridge.
So, how to prevent large trucks from using the bridge, while allowing smaller vehicles to continue to make deliveries in Saugatuck?
Cribari Bridge, near Bridge Square. (Photo/Cathy Walsh)
Signs saying “No Through Trucks” are a good idea which will discourage drivers from trying to cross the bridge. But they won’t prevent those who choose to ignore them from using it.
Another good idea would be to incorporate into the design a superstructure low enough to prevent large trucks from crossing. Whether that would be acceptable given the regulatory scheme may be problematic.
But a third possibility has not received much attention: the use of existing technology to provide a warning system at the approach to, and at some distance from, the bridge.
Here are some examples:
A radar-based truck detection system that identifies trucks of a designated size, and activates flashing lights and/or a siren.
Electronic “No Through Trucks” signs which are activated only when a truck of a specified size approaches. I have seen them saying “No Through Trucks. Approaching a residential area. Choose alternate route.”
Some places in Europe have used gates or retractable bollards to restrict access by oversized vehicles.
Enforcement cameras with clear signage saying they are in use have proved to be successful deterrents in some locations.
It’s easy to add signage to enforcement cameras.
The Cribari Bridge is one of only 3 vehicle crossings of the Saugatuck River. As such, it needs to function safely and efficiently without being exposed to large truck traffic.
I would like to see the use of technology to prevent unwanted traffic be given more attention than it has received to date, and be seriously considered as we move through the regulatory process.
(“068808” Opinion pages are open to all. Send submissions to 06880blog@gmail.com. To help support this hyper-local blog, please click here. Thank you!)
I feel like this part of your argument makes the case for ensuring the new bridge can support all vehicle traffic, inclusive of the large trucks.
“The Cribari Bridge is one of only 3 vehicle crossings of the Saugatuck River. As such, it needs to function safely and efficiently without being exposed to large truck traffic.”
I have previously commented on my preference for a new structure. One that includes walking and bike paths and does not allow for trailer truck traffic .The Saugatuck area needs protection from commercial traffic not only for local residents but also for train travelers.Imagine a number of trailers creating delays at peak travel times. I think Larry Weismann’s ideas are excellent.A hefty fine should be accessed for those that ignore the signs.
Larry,
I am one of those who view this bridge as a significant part of our Town’s history, no different than the old Town Hall structure on the Post Road East, or many of the old churches in our community.
I do believe, historic preservation through restoration, recognizes and honors the accomplishments of those who came before us.
I also believe restoring while upgrading the bridge to incorporate safety features is an achievable goal.
People too often confuse being new with being better. In the world of today’s modern construction, I can assure you, this is not always the case.
The Cribari Bridge has significant value as it stands today and it deserves to be recognized (as it already is listed on the National Register of Historic Places) as more than just a narrow road that carries vehicles.
A society loses a piece of its soul when it elects to erase its past.
I want to see this bridge rehabilitated, not replaced. I wish this community would join me and view this as an opportunity and not an impediment.
I do not want to see semi-tractor trailers on this bridge, ever, let them use the Post Road bridge.
I believe with the formation of the right committee, with professionals such as architects, engineers and builders (similar to the Public Site & Building Committee members) this bridge can be restored with safety features incorporated, without destroying the integrity of the structure.
When we moved here (36) years ago, Westport was an artist’s community. As two artists, that is why we moved here, to be with like minded folks who appreciate that Art is way more than just a name for your kid.
Mark my words, demolition of the Cribari Bridge for a new, wider, soulless, flattop bridge, similar to the Post Road Bridge, will change forever, the character of the Saugatuck Neighborhood.
~ Joseph V. Vallone, A.I.A.
While Larry’s suggestions are valuable, there are actually river crossings in Westport. The thruway and the Merritt Parkway. Both are free ways to cross the river, but the Merritt which is State owned restricts trucks.
Let’s get a waiver from the State!
I understand and respect Joe Vallone’s comments. But for me it’s a matter of priorities: safety and efficiency v. the competing values he espouses. The bridge is not, as he suggests, like the old town hall or the old library, it’s part of a thoroughfare that has to function continuously day after day to allow traffic to flow at acceptable speed, to open when necessary, and to assure that not only vehicles but pedestrians can cross safely. It’s more akin to a piece of machinery than it is to a building.
Readers can decide for themselves whether David Lofftedo is misreading what I wrote or whether I failed to make the point clearly that I only support replacing the bridge if the issue of large trucks can be addressed effectively.
The town/state can’t even use technology to keep that corner moving. WPD says its the State and they have asked for a protected right turn arrow but state never replied. That technology already exists, yet its not deployed. Town/WPD needs to follow up with the state.
Have you stood next to a semi tractor trailer? Imagine an evening walk to grab a quick bite in Saugatuck with your children on their bicycles and your dog on her leash, using the sidewalk, as multiple large and loud trucks are mere feet away. If larger vehicles are allowed to use the Cibrari Bridge it will most certainly change the character and safety of the neighborhood.
Can we also get those no through trucks cameras, signage and warnings for Sunrise Road? Trucks zoom up and down this neighborhood street all day ignoring the existing signage and nothing is done about it — despite calls to the Police Department, meetings with town officials and memos to various departments.