Larry Weisman is a longtime Westport resident, an attorney and a civic volunteer with many causes.
Intrigued by this morning’s “06880” post about “No Through Trucks” on the Cribari Bridge, he writes:
It is my thoroughly unscientific perception that, except for those who view the Cribari Bridge as a historic artifact which needs repair but should be preserved in its present configuration, a sizeable number of Westporters would favor its being replaced by a state of the art structure which will improve traffic flow and accommodate pedestrians and cyclists — provided only that 18-wheelers and similar large trucks can be prevented from accessing the bridge.
So, how to prevent large trucks from using the bridge, while allowing smaller vehicles to continue to make deliveries in Saugatuck?
Cribari Bridge, near Bridge Square. (Photo/Cathy Walsh)
Signs saying “No Through Trucks” are a good idea which will discourage drivers from trying to cross the bridge. But they won’t prevent those who choose to ignore them from using it.
Another good idea would be to incorporate into the design a superstructure low enough to prevent large trucks from crossing. Whether that would be acceptable given the regulatory scheme may be problematic.
But a third possibility has not received much attention: the use of existing technology to provide a warning system at the approach to, and at some distance from, the bridge.
Here are some examples:
A radar-based truck detection system that identifies trucks of a designated size, and activates flashing lights and/or a siren.
Electronic “No Through Trucks” signs which are activated only when a truck of a specified size approaches. I have seen them saying “No Through Trucks. Approaching a residential area. Choose alternate route.”
Some places in Europe have used gates or retractable bollards to restrict access by oversized vehicles.
Enforcement cameras with clear signage saying they are in use have proved to be successful deterrents in some locations.
It’s easy to add signage to enforcement cameras.
The Cribari Bridge is one of only 3 vehicle crossings of the Saugatuck River. As such, it needs to function safely and efficiently without being exposed to large truck traffic.
I would like to see the use of technology to prevent unwanted traffic be given more attention than it has received to date, and be seriously considered as we move through the regulatory process.
(“068808” Opinion pages are open to all. Send submissions to 06880blog@gmail.com. To help support this hyper-local blog, please click here. Thank you!)
I feel like this part of your argument makes the case for ensuring the new bridge can support all vehicle traffic, inclusive of the large trucks.
“The Cribari Bridge is one of only 3 vehicle crossings of the Saugatuck River. As such, it needs to function safely and efficiently without being exposed to large truck traffic.”
I have previously commented on my preference for a new structure. One that includes walking and bike paths and does not allow for trailer truck traffic .The Saugatuck area needs protection from commercial traffic not only for local residents but also for train travelers.Imagine a number of trailers creating delays at peak travel times. I think Larry Weismann’s ideas are excellent.A hefty fine should be accessed for those that ignore the signs.