“Where We Stand”: P&Z Candidates Look Ahead: Westport, 4 Years From Now

An informed electorate is the greatest bulwark of democracy.

Westporters understand this is a very important election. “06880” is doing our part, to help Westporters understand candidates’ perspectives on a variety of issues.

Once a week, between now and Election Day, we’re asking the men and women running for 3 important boards — Selectmen/women, Planning & Zoning, and Education — one specific question.

We’ll print their responses verbatim.

This week’s question for the Planning & Zoning Commission is:

If elected, how different will Westport look and feel at the end of your 4-year term? And how similar to today?

==================================================

Michele Paquette is a candidate with endorsements from 3 organizations. She will be listed on the ballot under both the Republican Party and The Coalition for Westport. Additionally, she has earned the support of the Westport Alliance for Saugatuck. She says:

If elected, Westport will look and feel both thoughtfully evolved and reassuringly familiar by the end of my 4-year term.

I believe in progress that honors our past, development that reflects our values, and governance that listens before it decides. My goal is not to reinvent Westport, but to steward its growth with transparency and community at the center.

Michele Paquette

Let’s start with what will feel different. First and foremost, I will champion in-person forums and enhanced communication.  I will be one of 7, and seek for the Planning & Zoning Commission to make the residents feel heard and a partner in the process.

Second, Westport will begin to reflect a more balanced approach to development. I will advocate for appropriate growth that respects our town’s character while addressing real needs — reduce potential for additional congestion, maintain density, address affordable housing, environmental resilience, and economic vitality.

That means a resident focused, thoughtful update to our 10-year development plan, the zoning code to match it, and then I will follow it.  It means encouraging maintenance of our town character, adaptive reuse of existing buildings, thoughtfully evaluating development in wetlands and on the river while protecting open space. It means asking not just “what can we build?” but “what should we build — and why?”

You’ll also see a stronger alignment between planning and sustainability. I will push for zoning that supports green infrastructure and flood resilience. Westport’s natural beauty is one of its greatest assets, and we must plan with climate realities in mind. From coastal neighborhoods to inland woodlands, our policies must reflect long-term stewardship—not short-term convenience.

And finally, the tone of civic engagement will shift. I bring decades of experience in strategic leadership, stakeholder alignment, and courageous decision-making. I will foster a culture of respect, collaboration and accountability — both within the commission, and across town and state government. I will seek to help residents feel empowered, not sidelined. Disagreements will be met with dialogue, not division. We will lead with facts, listen with empathy, and act with purpose.

Now, what will remain the same? Westport’s character. Our shoreline sunsets, our vibrant arts scene, our cherished neighborhoods and schools—these will remain the heart of our town. The charm of downtown, the bustle of Compo Beach in summer, the quiet dignity of our historic districts—these will continue to define us. I will protect the essence of Westport while guiding it toward a future that is resilient, and forward-thinking.

Our commitment to excellence will also endure. Westport has long been a town of high standards — whether in education, public services or civic pride. I will uphold those standards.

In short, Westport will feel more intentional and more prepared for the future. But it will still feel like home. My leadership will be rooted in listening, learning, and leading with integrity. I’m not running to impose a vision — I’m running to elevate yours.

By the end of my term, I want residents to say: “We were heard. We were respected. And we helped shape the future of our town.”

That’s the Westport I believe in. That’s the Westport I will fight for.

================================================

The Democratic Party has endorsed Michael Cammeyer, Bre Injeski and Craig Schiavone. Schiavone is also running on the Coalition for Westport ticket, and has been endorsed by the Alliance for Westport. They say:

Westport will look and feel like Westport. And that’s the point.

Four years from now, our town should remain a vibrant coastal community with the same charm and sense of belonging that make Westport such a great place to call home. Our team’s pragmatic and disciplined approach is essential to reconciling state mandates that push for dense development with our town’s commitment to thoughtful growth and environmental protection.

Our town’s interests are not advanced by P&Z commissioners acting as though the rights of private property owners to develop their land under state law can be ignored or undone by wishful thinking. Equally important, this conversation must include a realistic vision for what we strive to achieve, not only what we will protect against.

From left: Bre Injeski, Michael Cammeyer, Craig Schiavone.

How Westport will look and feel different:

If elected, we will update Westport’s Plan of Conservation and Development to responsibly guide future development with a focus on sustainability, preservation, and right-sized growth.

By the end of our next term, our goal is to have worked collaboratively and effectively with the next first selectman’s office to advance projects that strengthen our town: re-paving downtown parking areas while preserving parking where we need it, modernizing our schools, lighting our fields (especially for our girls sports teams), approving a community garden, creating a fenced dog run, developing town-led, low-density affordable cottage clusters, implementing flood mitigation infrastructure, and establishing an updated town maintenance facility in an appropriate location.

Our team doesn’t just talk about keeping Westport vibrant; we deliver on it. If Democrats maintain our seats on the P&Z, we’ll keep championing policies that strengthen small businesses and community life, from the seasonal closure of Church Lane and expanded outdoor dining to second-floor retail and converting office space for medical uses. Each of these initiatives has been divided along party lines, and could be lost if Republicans take the majority on the P&Z.

Finally, we welcome the opportunity to work with a new administration to put Westport’s 5-Year Affordability Plan into action. With new leadership in the first selectman’s office, it’s not too late to create thoughtfully designed, low-density affordable housing, like the cottage clusters our team has already legalized through zoning reform.

We’ll keep using our planning and zoning tools to encourage housing options that diversify opportunity without overwhelming the town. By planning carefully, we can meet our state affordability goals while preserving Westport’s scale and beauty.

How Westport will stay the same:

We’ll protect the small-town feel, architectural variety, and open spaces that make Westport unique. The Saugatuck River will still be the heart of downtown. Compo Beach will still bring families together. Our neighborhoods will still have that distinct Westport mix of creativity, warmth, and pride.

Westport’s schools, arts, and community spirit are unmatched. We’ll continue to make land-use decisions that support them. That means incentivizing thoughtful density instead of massive 8-30g projects. Our record of supporting right-sized office-to-residential conversions and affordable housing for our vulnerable residents, and adaptive re-use of historic properties (like at 136 Riverside Avenue) exemplifies our commitment to smart affordable housing growth.

Just as important, we believe in transparency and public participation. We will continue to listen, work through subcommittees, and engage openly with all residents and applicants who come before us.

Our team reads every letter. We hear you. We listen. We care. We will always be honest about what the P&Z can and cannot control given state law, and we will never mislead you about the consequences of our decisions.

At the end of our 4-year term, we hope residents will feel that Westport doesn’t just look well-planned, but it feels well-planned. That traffic got a little better, local businesses a little stronger, and housing a little more inclusive, all without losing the beauty and balance that define us.

We are genuinely excited about the opportunity to work with a new Board of Selectmen to preserve what makes this town special while planning responsibly for what comes next. This is our commitment to Westport.

Click here for last week’s “Where We Stand” responses.

Click here for the 2nd “Where We Stand” responses.

Click here for the first week’s “Where We Stand” question.

5 responses to ““Where We Stand”: P&Z Candidates Look Ahead: Westport, 4 Years From Now

  1. Robert M Gerrity

    Wonderful ideas/vision. Wonderful Presentation. Truly Civic People. Truly the Westport I grew up in.

    BUT — if you put an R for Republican after your name on a ballot, you are not just aligning yourself with Donald Trump and his Illegalities (which is everything he is doing right now — desecrating the White House is like the cherry on top of the Big Mac), you are identifying yourself as a SUPPORTER and thus “aiding & abetting” him in his CRIMES.

    Yes, CRIMES. Every executive order and even direct orders (like moving funds from one department to another to pay the military during this so-called “shut-down) is a violation of some law and above all, LAW itself. Everything he is doing is impeachable.

    How any of you lawyers reading this can stomach keeping an R as your party affiliation leaves me flabbergasted. You are sworn to uphold the Constitution, yet you will vote for, and throw $s at, a person who wakes up daily determined to use the “We The People” document as toilet paper? John Eastman has been disbarred in California for his actions supporting Trump over “Jan. 6.” Jeffrey Clark pleaded the 5th over 30 times in his “Jan. 6” disbarment procedure. Why would you associate yourself with these destroyers of The Rule of Law?

    NEVER vote for a Republican again. EVER.

    From Inflatable Costumed Greater Portland, Oregon.

  2. Werner Liepolt


    “If elected, we will update Westport’s Plan of Conservation and Development” is not the first thing I want to hear before an election.

    The kinds of updates current P&Z commissioners have brought to Westport include the zoning change that open the door for The Hamlet,

    What I’d like to hear is

    (1) what’s wrong with the current Plan of Conservation
    (2) a promise to assess the needs of Westport and both the legality and accuracy of current documents.

    As has been pointed out to P&Z staff, commissioners, and the First Selectperson since 2022, Westport’s Affordable Housing Document contains inaccuracies and a lack of knowledge of land records.

    The glowing and glib promises made do not seem to be based on competent staff work or knowledge.

    • James A Foster

      Werner, I am on the Affordable Housing Committee and would like to sit down with you to understand your issues with the current document and how we can make the next one in 2025 even better.

      • Werner Liepolt

        Thanks for the offer… glad to discuss how the factual errors and legal negligence seem to invalidate a document that was submitted as fulfillment of a state mandate.

        Starting in the spring of 2022, before its publication, I alerted P&Z staff and my elected representatives to the status of town owned property that was inaccurately represented in the Affordable Housing Plan as available for affordable housing, and requested a correction. I have continuously appealed for correction via certified letters and face to face discussions.

        Despite being ignored and going uncorrected to the present day, the court ordered settlement stipulation of the property containing The Saugatuck cooperative and the Saugatuck recreational field requires that no additional dwellings be built and that the field remains an open recreational field in perpetuity.

        How your committee can function with a charge based on a factually incorrect and legally questionable document should be your concern.

        How a planning and zoning commission can operate while blithely ignoring legal judgements and residents’ clearly stated and continuous requests is a matter for the ballot box.

      • Jim, I would also like to sit down with you.
        Westport needs to get its offsite affordable completely persona no grata or fix the Westport regs.
        I believe actually were a Westport resident or otherwise to challenge this FARCE, in court that a judge would cite all sorts of constitutional faux pas. I might decide to take that on.
        First the quality of housing when offsite affordable is extended to the contractor is garbage !
        Like a HARD NO !
        The quality of onsite and offsite should be identical.
        Ok, so bozo contractor says”well I’d like to build my 2.5 million dollar units and do offsite.
        Cool ! Kind of.
        So ! Bozo contractor needs to identify a plot of land, not already affordable, and build units of comparable quality etc. size etc..
        right now that is not what is happening. And if is NOT ok.
        But you know this. This is not news.
        let’s be honest the idea is not same points from state moratorium.. it is same dollar spend !
        So no extra profit for the contractor by doing off site.
        Right now, extra profit to the contractor is OUT OF CONTROL.
        Do please reach out.