Tag Archives: Westport government

John McCarthy: Time For Westport To Join The Information Age

We live in the Information Age.

Google that phrase. It takes 0.46 seconds to get 10,180,000,000 results.

Yet Westport cannot convey basic information — background material on upcoming board and commission meetings, say — to its 26,000 residents.

“Most towns haven’t kept up” with the Information Age, John McCarthy says.

Westport is “probably better than many,” he acknowledges. “But we can do better.”

If he — and a group of like-minded citizens — have their way, we will.

John McCarthy

A 1982 Staples High School graduate who returned here a few years after college and now serves as CFO for technology companies, he has a strong interest in local affairs.

He walks the talk, having run for — and served on — the Representative Town Meeting (RTM).

McCarthy comments frequently on town issues, on “06880.” He’s not the only one.

So after he wrote some long-simmering thoughts about how well (that is, poorly) town bodies share information, he shared them with several Westporters he thought might share his views.

They did.

McCarthy was sparked by 2 recent controversies: The Westport Community Gardens/Long Lots Elementary School project, and a new plan for Parker Harding Plaza.

While very different issues, he says, “the outpouring of concern over both are largely driven by the same recurring theme: Ordinary Westport residents do not feel like they always get the complete story from elected and appointed officials.”

This is not the first (and second) time this has happened, McCarthy notes.

And, he adds, “it is a non-partisan problem. It has existed with both Democratic and Republican town administrations.”

The Westport Community Gardens and Long Lots Preserve may be impacted by renovation or new construction of the nearby elementary school. But detailed plans have not been released publicly.

The result — “The Open Westport Initiative” — is “a non-partisan effort to make information and data created and stored inside Westport’s town government easily accessible to the public.”

“We have to make sure everyone has access to facts, so they can make up their own minds about issues,” McCarthy says.

Without access to information, residents “attribute malice” to decisions that are made. Often, McCarthy explains, “the decision-makers just have more facts.”

The reason that, for example, background materials are not posted along with meeting agendas — though they are emailed to commission, board and RTM members — is not because of malice, or a desire for power, he believes.

It is due, he says, to a combination of inertia, lack of technical know-how, and “maybe fear from lawyers that sharing everything might somehow hurt the town.”

Whenever he talks about “transparency” with town officials, McCarthy says, “they say, ‘all meetings are publicly noticed.’

“That’s true. But we have to go well beyond the legal notice.”

McCarthy notes that some meetings are still recorded on cassette tapes. He urges the town to invest in real-time transcription — a technology that is readily available.

Some town meetings are still interrupted to change cassette tapes.

McCarthy would also like to see every bit of information on a Town Hall computer or server — except for private, personal data —  be searchable by every resident, wherever they are.

“None of this should be controversial,” McCarthy insists. “Though I’m sure it will be.”

The next step is “getting people to talk about this. Let’s see if any elected officials want to take it up as a battle cry.”

Perhaps, he says, a group like the League of Women Voters can develop a “public transparency scorecard.” They could grade local boards and commissions on a variety of criteria, and publicize the results.

This project is not tied to the upcoming municipal election, McCarthy says. However, “if I was running for office and supported this idea, I’d say, ‘If elected I’ll do whatever I can to make this a reality.”

So far, McCarthy has financed the entire project himself: He paid $10 to register the OpenWestport.org domain.

He hopes “06880” readers will comment on his idea (including perhaps, “things are fine just the way they are”).

“I have lots of good stories about dealing with Town Hall. Other times, there’s room for improvement,” he says.

“It all comes down to the old saying: ‘Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But they’re not entitled to their own set of facts.’

“I want us all to operate from the same set of facts.”

The Open Westport initiative was signed by Toni Simonetti, Morley Boyd, Tom Prince, John McCarthy, Susan McCarthy, Chris Grimm, John Suggs, Grayson Braun, Jamie Walsh, Doug Enslin and Jay Walshon. Click here to read the full document. Questions? Email john@openwestport.org. 

(If “06880” helps you keep up with whatever is happening in town, please support our work. Just click here. Thank you!)

Election Day: 2 Days Later

The voters have spoken.

Well, some of them.

With just over 8,400 of Westport’s 19,811 eligible voters casting ballots, Republicans retain Town Hall. Control of the selectman’s office has ping-ponged between parties ever since the 1970s, when a 25-year stretch of Republicans ended.

This will be the 3rd straight term for Republican leadership. But this is Westport, not Washington or many other places in America.

We’re a blue town, in a blue state. And we’re a town. We’re neighbors. We see our new selectwomen — and, notably, this is the first time in our history the top 2 slots are filled by  females — everywhere. The market, the beach, doctor’s offices — they’re part of our community.

Westport’s new 1st selectwoman Jen Tooker (right) and 2nd selectwoman Andrea Moore

Jen Tooker and Andrea Moore are Westporters, through and through. Tooker has lived here for many years; Moore is a Staples graduate.

Both have extensive experience. Tooker is the incumbent 2nd selectwoman; Moore serves on the Board of Finance. They know this place. They know us. They will guide our town with wisdom, strength, compassion and care.

Tooker and Moore won the election with substantial support from Democrats and independents. Both groups represent the bulk of Westport voters.

Tuesday’s election was hardly a Republican wave. Democrats continue to control all boards and commissions. They outpolled their opponents — in some cases, substantially — in races that were both contested, and uncontested.

Planning & Zoning — one of the most important bodies in town — saw the re-election of 3 Democratic incumbents.

The Board of Education — another crucial body — was humming quietly along, with 2 candidates from each party “vying” for 4 seats. A late write-in candidate plastered the town with signs, but drew less than 5% of the vote.

Suddenly — less than a week before Election Day — one candidate slammed his own Republican Party, for failing to take a stand on the Critical Race Theory debate, and alleging it had stopped him from campaigning.

The resulting extensive publicity did not seem to matter. Both Republicans drew nearly the same number of votes; at around 21%, both trailed their Democratic rivals, who were around 28%. All 4 now make up the majority of the new Board of Ed.

Town Hall will continue with Republicans in the top spot — and Democrats leading board and commission meetings held htere.

One of the big stories of this election was the number of uncontested races. The Board of Finance and Zoning Board of Appeals had the same number of candidates as open spots; so (without the write-in candidate) did the Board of Ed.

Six of the town’s 9 Representative Town Meeting districts did not have competitive races.

Combined with the low turnout, that raises a crucial question: How much do Westporters really care about our town government?

Kudos to the men and women who stepped up this election season. Thanks to all who ran, whether they were opposed or not.

You will run our town well. You will put in countless hours, read mind-numbing reports, attend endless meetings, and hear from many residents, with ideas, insights and complaints ranging from very valid to ridiculously absurd.

Some of them may have voted for you. Some of them may have voted against you. Some may not have voted at all.

That’s the reality of democracy. We get the government we deserve.

Or, in Westport’s case, sometimes it’s even better than we deserve.