Last week, the Representative Town Meeting’s Transit Committee voted 7-2 against recommending that the full RTM spend $630,000 in American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds to redesign Jesup Green, and the nearby Imperial Avenue parking lot.
Tonight, the final item on the full RTM’s agenda is to vote on a request by the director of Public Works, and a recommendation by the Board of Finance, to approve an appropriation of $630,000 from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) Fund for design
and permitting of the redevelopment of Jesup Green and the Imperial Lot.
Here is the report of the RTM Transit Committee, which the full RTM will consider tonight (Tuesday, 7:30 p.m., Town Hall auditorium; click here for the livestream):
Presentation
Director of Public Works Pete Ratkiewich began the meeting with a PowerPoint presentation on downtown parking. The presentation included an overview of the history, the proposed scope of work, costs and timing as well as the reasons for the $630K appropriation request. The discussion primarily focused on the Parking Harding and Jesup lots. (Note: the current Jesup lot is also known as the “ Taylor lot.”)
● History
○ Many downtown parking issues today are similar to those 20 years ago.
○ Desire to connect to the river front wherever possible.
○ Most recent plan: 2015 Downtown Master Plan.
Parker Harding Plaza, through the years.
● Parker Harding
○ Current layout does not meet ADA and Fire Code standards (currently short 3
ADA spaces).
○ Proposed redesign would result in a net loss of 42 spaces.
○ Jesup Green (upper portion) identified the location for the relocated 42 spaces.
● Overall goals
○ Reconstructed Parker Harding and the Taylor lot (lower Jesup) with no net loss in parking.
○ Proposed 850 square foot net increase in green space (once phases are complete).
● Funding/Cost:
○ Current Appropriation Request: $630,000 full design/permitting for Taylor Lot (lower Jesup Green) and Imperial lots.
○ Prior Appropriation (2022): $400,000 completed schematic designs for Parker Harding, Jesup and Imperial, and full design of Parker Harding.
○ Capital Cost Forecast: $11 million
● Projected Phasing – Town is working to move forward with a phased approach:
○ Phase I: construct parking on Jesup Green to alleviate parking issues caused by
Parker Harding reconstruction. Then reconstruct Parker Harding.
○ Phase II: Re-align Jesup Road. Convert part of Taylor Lot (lower Jesup) to green space.
○ Phase III: TBD – “will occur when the police station is relocated”.
Summary and vote
● The committee thanked the DPW and Downtown Plan Implementation Committee for their hard work.
○ Appreciate the decades-old history and efforts.
○ Committee agreed we all want to find a balance between thriving downtown, river access, and enhanced green space.
○ “We’re getting there.” But the only way to accomplish that is to “look at it
holistically first.”
● Desire to move forward but recognized that some things have changed and some things have not yet been adequately addressed:
○ Explore gaining spaces elsewhere before taking Jesup Green (e.g. Baldwin). “Put concrete where concrete is now.”
○ Why not use a portion of the $630,000 to fund an analysis of the cost of structured parking and/or fee-based parking?
○ Evaluate impacts of soon-to-be implemented 3-hour timed parking.
○ The Jesup side should be coordinated with the police station site. For these reasons, the majority of the committee felt that the $630,000 appropriation is not justified.
The Baldwin parking lot, after its recent renovation.
Motion made to approve the $630,000 appropriation:
● 2 in favor – (Bloom, Burkhardt)
● 7 against – (Lowenstein, Liccione, Cohen, Johnson, Benmosche, Gold, Levy)
Below is information with additional detail on some of the issues/points raised by the committee at Monday’s meeting.
RTM Transit Committee discussion:
Various questions were raised by the committee:
Jesup Green
● Multiple questions were raised about the apparent conflict between the proposed parking plan for Jesup Green and stated goals in the 2015 Downtown Plan:
○ Prior plans recommended both expanding riverfront access wherever
possible while retaining existing open space, including Jesup Green.
● Concerns raised around paving green space for more blacktop:
○ Current plan takes upwards of ⅓ of Jesup Green, and removes several
mature trees in the middle and upper portion of the Green.
○ The proposed first stage is to build the 40 spots on Jesup Green before
the redevelopment of Parker Harding.
● Concerns about losing green space on Jesup with no guarantees about the future.
● Currently the entire width of the library opens up to the Green on both floors. Under the proposed plan for Jesup Green the library would overlook a parking lot.
● Is Jesup Green deed restricted?
● Why hasn’t the cost of structured parking been considered before moving forward to pave the upper portion of Jesup Green?
○ Pete Ratkiewich indicated “no shovels in ground until 2025,” indicating that a delay of a
couple of months to evaluate a deck on Baldwin will not seriously delay the
project.
● Is a new waterfront playground a driver of the current DPIC plan?
Jesup Green is surrounded by a road, police station, the Westport Library, parking, and the Saugatuck River. (Photo/Samuel Wang)
Taylor Lot / Jesup Road
● It was noted that the current configuration of the Taylor Lot balances the needs of downtown (including across the river) and the library while providing good access to the waterfront (especially ADA) and Jesup Green .
● Existing waterfront
○ Does it make sense to take upwards of ⅓ of Jesup Green (estimated cost – $4 million) to build a different green space near the library’s lower entrance when there is green space there now?
○ Existing green space along the river and in front of the lower library entrance is lightly used and enjoyed, but not well maintained.
● Jesup Road was recently repaved. Does it make sense to spend money on ripping up a new road?
○ Could proposed angled-parking lead to further congestion caused by people
circulating for parking and/or backing up into the line of traffic?
Economic Changes:
● Does the new plan actually reflect changes the town has seen in the last few years with increased economic activity downtown and new stores, restaurants, shops and cultural attractions?
Timing/Need:
● Concerns that “we’ve lost the forest before the trees”; the 8-24 for Parker Harding has not been approved by the P&Z. Nevertheless, the committee is voting on an appropriation that would result in paving Jesup Green for the purpose of recovering parking spots lost at Parker Harding, on a plan that so far is not approved (?). (NOTE: The P&Z approved the 8-24 for Parker Harding last night.)
● Comment: “Is there any reason why we can’t live with parking as it is now until the police station moves, then do all 3 phases together so we know we are going to get the green space back?:
Discussions have begun about a new police station. The current one is adjacent to Jesup Green.
● It is not clear if the 40 spots on Jesup Green will be needed once the timed parking is implemented – then people who need longer term parking may choose not to park on Parker Harding or Main Street:
○ Consider monitoring the impact of the 3-hour limit first.
○ How often is Baldwin lot full (just holidays or more frequently?).
○ Perhaps wayfinding signs could help with parking losses on Parker Harding.
● Concerns around whether ARPA funding can be used when Westport’s downtown is thriving following the pandemic-related influx of new residents.
● Concerns around opportunities for public feedback:
○ Next formal phase of public comment will follow after Jesup Green is paved.
○ Public never asked the question whether they prefer more parking downtown or green space.
● Those who expressed support for the current appropriation felt that further delay is akin to “paralysis by analysis”; the phased approach outlines how the town will ultimately end up with more green space. But others expressed concerns that the promise for more green space in the future could be jeopardized by lack of funding appropriations for various phases and the uncertainty around the timing and plan for the police station site.
● Concerns that we are spending a lot of money on one narrow view forward:
○ Both $630,000 request and $400,000 prior ARPA funding represents over $1 million in plans for one view without any funds directed to evaluating alternatives for parking other than paving ⅓ of Jesup Green.
