Tag Archives: Joseph Vallone

Affordable Apartment Plan Dropped; Moratorium Points Lost

In recent days, Westport camethisclose to moving forward on a new affordable housing project.

Just a few yards from the Post Road, its 32 units would have provided apartments for teachers, police officers, firefighters and other town employees.

Estimates are that 242 town employees could qualify, at less than 60% of the area media income (about $82,000, for a family of 2).

Of those, 144 are teachers. The high cost of housing — and long commutes from communities where homes are less expensive — is one reason educators leave the Westport district.

And — because every one of those units would be considered affordable under state guidelines — it would have marked an enormous step forward in Westport’s efforts toward a moratorium from Connecticut’s onerous 8-30g mandate.

But the plan to convert the current hair salon and adjacent multifamily home at 6 Maple Avenue South — just behind the Exxon station — was scuttled right near the end of real estate negotiations. Owner Ken Kronberg (who also owns the gas station) decided not to sell.

6 Maple Avenue South. The Exxon gas station (not shown) is on the right.

Architect Joseph Vallone and Rick Redniss of the civil engineering and land use firm Redniss & Mead had worked on the plan since last fall.

Redniss tells “06880” that, with 4% low-income housing tax credit financing, the 32 units might have yielded 40.5 points — almost 20% of those needed for Westport’s next 8-30g moratorium.

A traditional 8-30g development, with only 10 affordable units, would yield only 23 points.

Vallone and Redniss were all set to move forward with a text amendment, called “Deed Restricted Housing Development.”

But after speaking with several neighbors, Kronberg declined to sell. Those plans are now off the table.

Joe Vallone’s sketch of the proposed 32-unit affordable housing apartment building at 6 Maple Avenue South.

Kronberg — who has owned the property for 36  owned the gas station for 36 years, and 6 Maple Avenue South since May 1 last yea r— tells “06880” tha after hearing from several neighbors, and seeing a sketch of the proposed apartments, “I didn’t want to be the bad guy that created a large commercial look at the top of Maple South.”

He is unsure what comes next for the property. The 3 bedrooms and studio apartment are rented, but the salon has been empty since Juljen moved to Southport.

“In a perfect world, I’d like to fix it up,” he says. “Make it super-nice, maybe like an old-fashioned barber shop, maybe with apartments or a quaint house.”

Redness rues the lost opportunity.”Westport has missed an opportunity to meet the needs and goals outlined in the Plan of Conservation and Development and Affordable Housing Plan,” he wrote on Tuesday to Planning & Zoning director Michelle Perillie.

“A well-known, long-term, local Westport resident with a proven track record in town was preparing to leverage his expertise to help provide true workforce housing. Joe Vallone was days away from our pre-app meeting with the Planning & Zoning Commission when the property owner reneged on selling the property.”

(“06880” is your hyper-local source for real estate, political and business news — and much more. Please click here to support our work. Thank you!)

The Exxon station, Post Road East at the Maple Avenue South corner.

Engineer, Architect Offer Long Lots Help

Professional engineer Yulee Aronson, and architects Joseph Vallone and Patricia Chen offer these thoughts:

For the past 6 months we’ve followed the saga that is the proposed reconstruction of Long Lots Elementary School

During this time we’ve learned about this property, its history, stakeholders, and users.

Like many of us who have followed the public debate on various blog posts regarding these issues, we’ve observed the temperature rise of some of these comments to unacceptable levels.

We understand how emotional it may get for some with a lot at stake, but we should all remember that we are neighbors and need to treat each other with respect. We attribute some of the emotional outrage to the lack of awareness of the due process required to take a project like this from concept, through regulatory approvals to final design and construction.

Long Lots Elementary School. (Drone photo/Brandon Malin)

To begin, the first step in the regulatory approval is to follow 2022 Connecticut General Statutes, Title 8 – Zoning, Planning, Housing and Economic and Community Development, Chapter 126 – Municipal Planning Commissions, Section 8-24. – Municipal improvements. For short, this has been referred to as P&Z’s commission 8-24 review.

It is important to note that this being a school reconstruction project, the most important element to include in this application would be to show the new plan for the school and deal with the other elements later in the process. Considering that the school replacement would reduce the school’s footprint on the property, the approval could have been easily gotten on the first go-around in December of last year.

Unfortunately, in addition to the new school the proposal included construction of new athletic fields. Had the athletic fields remained the same size as the existing ones, adding them to the proposal wouldn’t be an issue. However, the proposal contained expansion of these fields, ignoring the earlier ruling by P&Z in 2010 and thus jeopardizing almost certain approval by P&Z.

Below is an excerpt from Eileen Lavigne Flug, assistant town attorney’s memo dated April 26, 2022″

On February 11, 2010 (modified June 10, 2010), the P&Z issued a Special Permit/Site Plan at the request of the Parks and Recreation Department for the expansion of the community gardens, stating that, “The Commission finds that the use of this site for the Community Garden, instead of the previously proposed use for athletic fields, remains in keeping with the 2007 POCD.”

With all the back and forth surrounding reconstruction of LLS, all stakeholders unanimously agree that the new school must be replaced as soon as possible. According to the initial schedule in the RFQ for feasibility study, the study should have been completed in August of last year and 8-24 application was soon to follow. Six months later and the December application withdrawn, the new application is yet to be resubmitted. Why?

As an independent group of professionals, we would like to offer our time and expertise to help our elected officials expedite the reconstruction process while working to ensure minimal disruption to the functionality of the site and the neighborhood. We understand that a similar offer was made by the chair of the Public Site & Building Committee. Let’s all work together and get it done for our kids!

Long Lots Committee Hears New Proposal

Mia Bomback reports:

Once again, the Long Lots School Building Committee failed to reach a final decision regarding a plan for a new elementary school.

But last night’s meeting brought a major development.

Literally. 

Westport architect Joseph Vallone presented his own plan for the demolition and reconstruction of a new building that preserves the Westport Community Gardens and Long Lots Preserve — and the property’s existing baseball field.

Vallone’s solution? A 3-story school. 

It would be built on the site of the current baseball diamond.

He presented 2 versions. The new athletic field would be constructed where the school now stands, or on the current parking lot.

“This is 2023. We need to be designing a 3-story building with compact massing and a smaller footprint,” said Vallone, a licensed architect and developer, and member of Westport’s Public Site & Building Commission.

One version of architect Joseph Vallone’s plan …

Vallone’s idea was met with criticism from committee members. They said that a 3-story proposal violated previously stated Board of Education specifications. 

Vallone replied: “Let’s not forget that both Kings Highway [Elementary School] and Greens Farms [Elementary School] are 3 stories.”

… and another.

Following Vallone’s proposal, Jennifer Fava — director of Westport’s Parks & Recreation Department — presented her report on usage of the athletic fields on Long Lots property. 

The report revealed that over 11,000 participants utilize these fields annually, excluding physical education classes, adult leagues, and camp rentals. The report said there are 108 participants of the Westport Community Gardens. (Click here for a full report.)

While Fava’s report proposed possible alternative locations for a baseball field, including Winslow Park and Lillian Wadsworth Arboretum, these options pose “challenges” for fields requiring an abundance of space and specific topography, LLSBC member Don O’Day noted. 

Rick Koczera then provides estimates from Newfield Construction. Building Plans A and B — involving renovations and extensions — were the most expensive, totaling around $107.5 million and $105.7 million, respectively.

Plan E — calling for the relocation of the gardens — is the least expensive, with an estimated cost of $91.5 million.

Plan C-ALT — the only reconstruction plan retaining the garden’s current site (potentially in exchange of a baseball field) — was slightly more expensive, projected at around $94.3 million.

Cost estimates were projected on a screen at last night’s meeting. (Click on or hover over to enlarge)

The renovation plans take longer to finish, Koczera added, nd will require 29 to 30 months of construction before the school can operate. The reconstruction plans allow students to return to school 18 months after construction begins. 

The meeting in Town Hall Rooms 201/201A concluded with public commentary from neighbors and gardeners alike, voicing fears for sustainability of the property. 

“Our biggest concern pertains to the demolition of the gardens in lieu of a ball field,” Sloan Sehr said.

“As all of us who live on Bauer [Place] know, there are already a myriad of different drainage and flooding issues, and the removal of these community gardens is going to directly jeopardize the sanctity of our homes.

“When you don’t have all the plants, the trees to absorb all this water, what recourse do we have as residents when our basements are flooded?”

The small Town Hall meeting room was filled last night. Some attendees stood in the hall. (Photo/Karen Mather)

The committee intends to vote on which proposal to recommend to First Selectwoman Jen Tooker at next week’s meeting.

Advocates for the preservation of the garden are wary of a rushed decision. 

“I am calling on the First Selectwoman to delay [her recommendation],” Sal Liccione, a Representative Town Meeting member, said, “so we can have a community meeting, ASAP, to discuss all of our options, including Mr. Vallone’s plan.” 

(“06880” provides hyper-local journalism every day. Please click here to support our work. Thank you!)