Westport’s Water: “A Sobering View”

Marc Lemcke is a Westport resident, and a close observer of water utility Aquarion’s presence in town.

Last Thursday, he attended a community discussion about water. He calls it “a sobering view of Westport’s water future.” Marc writes:

Thank you to Valerie Seiling Jacobs, Robert Harrington and our expert State Representative Jonathan Steinberg for your role in the discussion.

Below are 5 key takeaways:

1. The North Avenue tanks are a symptom of failed oversight.

  • They are not only part of a broader water system, but a manifestation of a larger problem: failed utility oversight.
  • The tanks were never designed for Westport’s specific water challenges, despite the water company’s claims.
  • The water company misled the community and the P&Z to avoid scrutiny of a much larger project: the $200 million Southwest Regional Pipeline Project.
  • The state Public Utilities Regulatory Authority and Department of Public Health were fully aware that this narrative was at best incomplete, and at worst false.
  • Westport’s long-known water challenges are unlikely to see tangible improvements in fire protection any time soon.

North Avenue water tank. (Photo/Richard Fogel)

2. The Town is not honoring the 2019 agreement.

  • As part of a settlement, the town of Westport formally agreed with residents in 2019 to review the project’s impact on Westport. The town is not honoring this agreement.
  • The town has not been responding to questions. Instead, the water company has filed an application with the local Planning & Zoning Commission change the permit and obtain a certificate of project compliance.
  • The town has, in practice, limited transparency around this case and Westport’s broader water challenges.

3. The P&Z application is materially incomplete.

  • The application assumes compliance with permit conditions without providing evidence.
  • Screening as promised was never possible, because of underground pipes.
  • Important comments are missing entirely, including from the Westport Fire Department.
  • The statutory clock was started without taking public testimony.
  • The P&Z has chosen to interpret its jurisdiction very narrowly.

4. Hard-won transparency gains are at risk.

  • Thanks to dedicated public officials and policymakers, the Westport tank project helped trigger important legislative changes (the “Take Back the Grid” Act and SB 7).
  • Many of those public interest professionals have now resigned, face lawsuits, or are no longer running for re-election.
  • Residents and ratepayers have won a few battles, but are at risk of losing the larger war.

5. The sale of Aquarion is a deeper crisis than expected.

  • The $2.6 billion acquisition of our water system by the Regional Water Authority is now emerging as a crisis sooner and deeper than many expected.
  • Aquarion’s 2022 rate case effectively ended an unsustainable business model, and Eversource ran for the door.
  • Previously unknown to many of us: Representative Steinberg said that the State “guaranteed” Eversource a $200 million profit on its sale of Aquarion. This guarantee raises serious questions.

Click here for a recording of the meeting, background material and contact information.

5 responses to “Westport’s Water: “A Sobering View”

  1. The plot thickens ‼️
    Good luck 🍀

  2. It would only take two RTMs to bring this dumpster fire into the light for review and discussion. After all the election talk about transparency and accountability recently, this would be a perfect opportunity to walk the talk.

    • Morley, There is only 1 person who can put items on the RTM agenda, the RTM Moderator. The charter section that discusses how items can get on the agenda lumps the 1st Selectman and “2 RTM members” together with the 20 petitioning electors. So, if the moderator can censor the 20 petitioning electors as he claims, then logically he can also censor the 1st Selectman and the “2 RTM members.”

      How does that feel RTM members? Kevin?

  3. Werner Liepolt

    Bringing this matter into light via the RTM is crucial… removing the local P&Z control we currently have will result in not only massive increases in the cost of water to residents but also clear the way for a questionable sale to an organization that does not have to and will not answer to our town.

    Other towns recognize the problems as does the CT AG, and we should join with them in taking a strong stand.