Lamont Discourages Gatherings Of More Than 100 People

First Selectman Jim Marpe has passed along word that Governor Ned Lamont and the state Department of Public Health are discouraging large public gatherings attracting more than 100 persons, in response to the COVID-19 virus.

Marpe says:

 The state has partially activated its Emergency Operations center in response to the accelerating impact of the COVID-19 virus into the region and the growing threat within the state. The center held a conference call today at 5 p.m. for all emergency operations managers, municipal chief elected officials and key staff to hear an update of the recommended protocol.

According to Lamont, large crowds or places where individuals are shoulder-to-shoulder are considered the most dangerous and should be avoided, particularly for individuals over the age of 60.

While the directive is neither a mandate nor a declaration of a state of
emergency, the governor’s message was clear that the state needs to implement policies that discourage the spread of the virus.

Governor Ned Lamont

For example, Lamont is also instituting a freeze on out-of-state business travel for all state employees, as well as the postponement of any state-organized conferences anticipated to have more than 100 people in attendance, and urging
private employers to consider similar precautions.

The chief elected officials and superintendents of schools are responsible for the decisions and details on how localities respond to this directive. Marpe is working closely with interim superintendent Dr. David Abbey on a plan to address this recommendation locally.

Marpe says, “Based on the directive from the governor’s office, the town of Westport strongly encourages residents to re-think attendance at gatherings of more than 100 individuals and large gatherings where individuals might be shoulder-to-shoulder. We recognize that this will impact a number of recurring or long-planned and important activities, but we ask organizers and attendees to give appropriate consideration to the governor’s request.”

Town administration and the Board of Education are following the guidelines
from the CT DPH, with support and guidance from the Westport Weston Health District

For the time being, town functions are operating as normal, but with extra attention given to cleanliness and disinfection of the facilities and equipment.

COVID-19 is an evolving situation and today’s announcement is an example of that. There has been ongoing planning and decision-making in response to the situation, and residents are encouraged to maintain connections with the town resources so that up-to-date information can be received effectively, efficiently, and as quickly as possible.

State Representative Jonathan Steinberg (left), who co-chairs the Legislature’s Public Health Committee, and 1st Selectman Jim Marpe demonstrate the best way to say hello, COVAD-19-style.

To keep residents, students and businesses informed, the town will utilize press releases, its website, and its social media pages for all of its COVID-19 announcements.

  • The Westport emergency notification system is a text message-based alert system run by the Fire Department. Any resident not already signed up for these notifications can text 06880 to 888777 to subscribe.
  • The Town webpage dedicated to COVID-19 can be found at Westportct.gov/COVID-19.
  • The hashtag #WestportctCOVID-19info will be used for updated information on the town’s Facebook, Instagram and Twitter social media accounts. This will also be utilized by the Fire, Police and Parks Departments.
  • To follow the Town’s press release coverage, go to WestportCT.Gov/subscribe and select “town news.”

The Department of Public Works has instituted an extra rigorous cleaning regimen in all public spaces, and released information on Friday alerting staff and elected officials of its procedures and best practices.

The Board of Education sent a coronavirus update informing parents of the importance of hand washing and the district’s use of cleaning agents, as well as
contingency planning.

On Tuesday, March 10, the schools will have a 3-hour delay so that
professionals can prepare for the possibility of home-based learning.

The town management, public safety professionals, the WWHD leadership and all department heads are working together with the Westport Public Schools to design contingency plans if the situation evolves to a point where town and school functions may need to be altered.

For example, the Board of Education is examining home-based instructional continuity and other strategies in the event of a school or district closing.

Town Hall staff are preparing to offer some public services on a remote basis if necessary. The Senior Center Activities is also preparing to operate as a drop-in-center in case programs must be cancelled.

Conducting public meetings may become challenging, but much of this will have to be determined based on a case-by-case basis.

For the time being, Marpe urged residents to follow these best practices to
prevent the spread of COVID-19:

Cover your mouth when you sneeze or cough. Cough or sneeze into your sleeve, not your hand.

  • Wash your hands frequently. While hand sanitizer may be effective, vigorous hand washing using regular soap is best.
  • Greet others with an elbow bump instead of a handshake.
  • Stay home if you are feeling unwell.
  • If you feel sick with fever, cough, or difficulty breathing, and have been in close contact with a person known to have COVID-19, or if you live in or have recently traveled from a high-risk area, contact your health professional.

10 responses to “Lamont Discourages Gatherings Of More Than 100 People

  1. Marpe has suggested folks avoid large meetings, Lamont urges folks to avoid meetings of more than a 100 and, yet, our schools remain open. What’s wrong with this picture?

  2. It all just seems a little crazy. While I understand this virus is not well-understood, so far it seems to be playing out a lot like the flu, where those who are immunocompromised in some way are the most likely to experience complications. But unlike the flu, many people (according to news reports, so who knows) tend to experience mild or no symptoms. Unless there’s a great spike in CT cases (so far, two in the entire state) it seems like an overreaction. Of course we (local gov and residents) should be prepared to turn on a dime should cases suddenly flare in the area, and adjust or cancel events and meetings as needed. But to start limiting everything based on so-far two cases seems over the top. Of course defer to the town and medical experts on what’s best, but just my thoughts.

    • Diane Johnson

      Without adequate access to testing in the US over the past several weeks, it’s very hard to know exactly how many cases there are currently in CT. We know from experience in other regions COVID 19 numbers can increase quickly. Just two weeks ago Italy had nine cases; as of yesterday they now have over 9,000 cases with 463 deaths reported. I don’t think it’s an overreaction to implement social distancing, crowd avoidance and other measures to mitigate the spread.

  3. Bob Stalling

    Social distancing is a good thing.
    My question is this:
    In the flu season of 2017-18, 900,000 Americans were hospitalized and over 80,000 died.
    I could be wrong, but was the reaction the same then as it is today?

    • Bob, are you a doctor or researcher who specializes in infectious diseases? If not, I’m just curious: what is it that you do for a living?

      And why do you seem to keep questioning or even mocking what the overwhelming percentage of doctors and scientists who specialize in infectious diseases recommend as precautionary measures we have not witnessed in our lifetime?

      Yes, Italy just has undertaken an unprecedented lockdown of the entire country. How do you feel that is political as you seemed to possibly infer on another post today?

      • Bob Stalling

        Hi Fred..
        Yes, I did notice that you didn’t answer the question.
        Thanks.

        • I have answered your question. The infectious disease specialists are treating this very differently even though they are fully cognizant of the dangers of the flu.

          The flu has long been considered a serious matter which, among other reasons, is why a flu shot is recommended.

          The scientific experts view this though on a whole other level—in terms of the potential dangers with no available vaccine and the potential for hospitals to be overwhelmed.

          So what do you do for a living that you have serious reservations about what the overwhelming percentage of those specializing in infectious diseases are recommending?

  4. Bob Stalling

    All you have to do is point out the part where I said I have serious reservations about current recommendations…that way I would be able to answer your question.
    Guess I was wondering where the current recommendations were in 2017-18 when over 80,000 people died.
    That question appears to strike a nerve with you for some reason…why?

    • Bob, I can’t even begin to follow your latest train of thought here but admittedly I have health issues and, as part of that, I had a certain level of brain damage. So perhaps that explains my failure to understand what you are now trying to say.

      But my educated guess based on your response is you do not work in the area of infectious diseases; and, as someone who has had to see a dr who specializes in infectious diseases, I try to listen very carefully to what she recommends.

  5. Bob Stalling

    Sorry to hear that Fred.
    You asked me to give you an answer to something I never said.
    I never said I have reservations about current recommendations, in fact I said “Social distancing is a good thing”
    Not sure what my job has to do with this, since I have not given you any recommendations regarding infectious diseases.